PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYBK.DE vs. XLKQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYBK.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Euro Stoxx Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LYBK.DE) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LYBK.DE is traded in EUR, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYBK.DE achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 21.58% return. Over the past 10 years, LYBK.DE has underperformed XLKQ.L with an annualized return of 15.90%, while XLKQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 25.62% annualized return.


LYBK.DE

1D
1.90%
1M
4.48%
YTD
6.06%
6M
12.72%
1Y
39.31%
3Y*
45.69%
5Y*
29.46%
10Y*
15.90%

XLKQ.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
6.65%
YTD
21.58%
6M
18.39%
1Y
45.40%
3Y*
32.28%
5Y*
25.66%
10Y*
25.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYBK.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYBK.DE
Amundi Euro Stoxx Banks UCITS ETF Acc
6.06%91.46%30.53%30.34%0.78%39.97%-22.43%17.74%-30.86%14.21%
XLKQ.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc
21.58%9.72%50.98%55.05%-24.67%45.15%30.44%53.56%1.28%17.02%

Correlation

The correlation between LYBK.DE and XLKQ.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013

0.34

The correlation between LYBK.DE and XLKQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYBK.DE vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYBK.DE
LYBK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
LYBK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYBK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYBK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
LYBK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYBK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

XLKQ.L
XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYBK.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Euro Stoxx Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LYBK.DE) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYBK.DEXLKQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.37

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

2.86

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.16

7.63

-0.47

LYBK.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYBK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYBK.DE and XLKQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYBK.DEXLKQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

2.27

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

0.96

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

1.08

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.79

-0.43

Drawdowns

LYBK.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYBK.DE drawdown since its inception was -63.98%, which is greater than XLKQ.L's maximum drawdown of -40.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYBK.DE and XLKQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYBK.DEXLKQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.98%

-40.10%

-23.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.12%

-15.78%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.90%

-30.46%

+10.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.32%

-30.46%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.22%

-30.78%

-31.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-5.59%

+4.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.24%

-8.03%

-12.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.45%

5.93%

-0.48%

Volatility

LYBK.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Euro Stoxx Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LYBK.DE) is 6.09%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 7.18%. This indicates that LYBK.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYBK.DEXLKQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.09%

7.18%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.28%

14.79%

+4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.99%

19.95%

+4.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.46%

26.76%

-1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.41%

23.78%

+4.63%

LYBK.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYBK.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYBK.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYBK.DE nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LYBK.DE and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LYBK.DE.

LYBK.DE is categorized as Financials Equities, while XLKQ.L is Technology Equities. LYBK.DE tracks EURO STOXX® Banks, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LYBK.DE and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYBK.DE and XLKQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer