LW vs. PZG
LW (Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.) and PZG (Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.) are both stocks. LW operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while PZG operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, LW returned -10.73%/yr vs 2.58%/yr for PZG. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LW vs. PZG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LW achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly higher than PZG's -7.14% return.
LW
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 3.41%
- 6M
- -27.23%
- 1Y
- -21.23%
- 3Y*
- -26.27%
- 5Y*
- -10.73%
- 10Y*
- —
PZG
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -18.75%
- YTD
- -7.14%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 103.90%
- 3Y*
- 59.19%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- -3.20%
LW vs. PZG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 3.41% | -35.69% | -37.01% | 22.32% | 42.89% | -18.40% | -7.23% | 18.27% | 31.81% | 51.77% |
PZG Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. | -7.14% | 268.42% | -8.80% | 8.70% | -50.62% | -40.29% | 51.28% | -6.82% | -36.15% | -26.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between LW and PZG is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2016 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
LW:
$5.93B
PZG:
$97.27M
LW:
$2.15
PZG:
-$0.09
LW:
3.25
PZG:
2.75
LW:
$6.52B
PZG:
$0.00
LW:
$1.34B
PZG:
-$892.14K
LW:
$893.90M
PZG:
-$11.01M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LW vs. PZG — Risk / Return Rank
LW
PZG
LW vs. PZG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) and Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LW | PZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.26 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 1.86 | -2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.90 | 4.65 | -5.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LW | PZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | 1.44 | -1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | 0.04 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | -0.09 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
LW vs. PZG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LW drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, smaller than the maximum PZG drawdown of -93.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LW and PZG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LW | PZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.56% | -93.81% | +29.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.37% | -56.18% | +14.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.56% | -56.18% | -8.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.56% | -74.05% | +9.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.44% | -73.53% | +13.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.26% | -68.57% | +47.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.67% | 22.43% | +1.24% |
Volatility
LW vs. PZG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) is 10.14%, while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. (PZG) has a volatility of 19.29%. This indicates that LW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PZG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LW | PZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.14% | 19.29% | -9.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.17% | 58.36% | -20.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.22% | 72.88% | -28.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.84% | 62.90% | -25.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.85% | 60.72% | -24.87% |
Dividends
LW vs. PZG - Dividend Comparison
LW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, while PZG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 3.52% | 3.53% | 2.15% | 1.04% | 1.10% | 1.48% | 1.17% | 0.93% | 1.04% | 1.33% |
PZG Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LW vs. PZG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LW and PZG have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PZG has higher volatility (19.29%) compared to LW (10.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LW dropped -64.56% vs PZG's -93.81%.
PZG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LW and PZG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer