PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LW vs. CNXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LW vs. CNXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) and Concentrix Corporation (CNXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LW achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly higher than CNXC's -32.63% return.


LW

1D
1.09%
1M
1.36%
YTD
3.41%
6M
-27.23%
1Y
-21.23%
3Y*
-26.27%
5Y*
-10.73%
10Y*

CNXC

1D
-1.58%
1M
12.81%
YTD
-32.63%
6M
-26.68%
1Y
-49.86%
3Y*
-29.25%
5Y*
-27.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LW vs. CNXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
3.41%-35.69%-37.01%22.32%42.89%-18.40%9.39%
CNXC
Concentrix Corporation
-32.63%-1.39%-55.03%-25.36%-24.91%81.22%23.37%

Correlation

The correlation between LW and CNXC is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2020

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LW:

$5.93B

CNXC:

$1.68B

EPS

LW:

$2.15

CNXC:

-$21.33

PS Ratio

LW:

0.91

CNXC:

0.17

PB Ratio

LW:

3.25

CNXC:

0.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

LW:

$6.52B

CNXC:

$9.95B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LW:

$1.34B

CNXC:

$3.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

LW:

$893.90M

CNXC:

-$944.68M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LW vs. CNXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LW
LW Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
LW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
LW Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
LW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
LW Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

CNXC
CNXC Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
CNXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNXC Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
CNXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNXC Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LW vs. CNXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) and Concentrix Corporation (CNXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LWCNXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.87

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

-0.81

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.90

-1.34

+0.44

LW vs. CNXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LW Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is higher than the CNXC Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LW and CNXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LWCNXCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.48

-0.82

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

-0.57

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

-0.33

+0.48

Drawdowns

LW vs. CNXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LW drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, smaller than the maximum CNXC drawdown of -87.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LW and CNXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LWCNXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.56%

-87.86%

+23.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.37%

-61.71%

+20.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.56%

-76.50%

+11.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.56%

-87.86%

+23.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.44%

-85.48%

+25.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.26%

-47.65%

+26.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.67%

37.32%

-13.65%

Volatility

LW vs. CNXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) is 10.14%, while Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) has a volatility of 15.12%. This indicates that LW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LWCNXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.14%

15.12%

-4.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.17%

51.98%

-13.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.22%

61.40%

-17.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.84%

48.26%

-10.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.85%

49.78%

-13.93%

Dividends

LW vs. CNXC - Dividend Comparison

LW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, less than CNXC's 5.16% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNXC
Concentrix Corporation
5.16%3.27%2.87%1.15%0.77%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
3.52%3.53%2.15%1.04%1.10%1.48%1.17%0.93%1.04%1.33%

Financials

LW vs. CNXC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and Concentrix Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.56B
2.50B
(LW) Total Revenue
(CNXC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LW vs. CNXC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and Concentrix Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
21.2%
34.0%
Portfolio components
LW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 331.60M and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.2%.

CNXC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Concentrix Corporation reported a gross profit of 849.66M and revenue of 2.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.0%.

LW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 126.60M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

CNXC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Concentrix Corporation reported an operating income of 118.56M and revenue of 2.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.7%.

LW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 54.00M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.

CNXC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Concentrix Corporation reported a net income of 21.59M and revenue of 2.50B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LW and CNXC have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNXC has higher volatility (15.12%) compared to LW (10.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LW dropped -64.56% vs CNXC's -87.86%.

LW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.48 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LW and CNXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer