LU vs. GDOT
LU (Lufax Holding Ltd) and GDOT (Green Dot Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Credit Services industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 5 years, LU returned -40.10%/yr vs -21.98%/yr for GDOT. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LU vs. GDOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LU achieves a -46.09% return, which is significantly lower than GDOT's -0.47% return.
LU
- 1D
- -4.83%
- 1M
- -29.23%
- YTD
- -46.09%
- 6M
- -47.92%
- 1Y
- -52.41%
- 3Y*
- -20.35%
- 5Y*
- -40.10%
- 10Y*
- —
GDOT
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- -1.92%
- 1Y
- 33.09%
- 3Y*
- -12.68%
- 5Y*
- -21.98%
- 10Y*
- -5.43%
LU vs. GDOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LU Lufax Holding Ltd | -46.09% | 7.11% | 73.97% | -58.03% | -60.48% | -60.35% | 10.51% |
GDOT Green Dot Corporation | -0.47% | 20.39% | 7.47% | -37.42% | -56.35% | -35.05% | 4.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between LU and GDOT is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2020 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
LU:
$31.92B
GDOT:
$2.18B
LU:
$13.50B
GDOT:
$323.19M
LU:
-$1.26B
GDOT:
$130.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LU vs. GDOT — Risk / Return Rank
LU
GDOT
LU vs. GDOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) and Green Dot Corporation (GDOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LU | GDOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.20 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 1.07 | -1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | 1.91 | -3.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LU | GDOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.99 | 0.68 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.53 | -0.43 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.49 | -0.14 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
LU vs. GDOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LU drawdown since its inception was -96.68%, roughly equal to the maximum GDOT drawdown of -93.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LU and GDOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LU | GDOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.68% | -93.17% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.64% | -30.95% | -37.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.41% | -69.62% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.84% | -88.43% | -6.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -93.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.24% | -86.27% | -8.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.40% | -60.24% | -18.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.82% | 17.37% | +20.45% |
Volatility
LU vs. GDOT - Volatility Comparison
Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) has a higher volatility of 12.14% compared to Green Dot Corporation (GDOT) at 5.85%. This indicates that LU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LU | GDOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.14% | 5.85% | +6.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.52% | 17.45% | +17.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.08% | 49.13% | +3.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.63% | 50.96% | +25.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.25% | 52.34% | +23.91% |
Dividends
LU vs. GDOT - Dividend Comparison
Neither LU nor GDOT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDOT Green Dot Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LU Lufax Holding Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 101.26% | 11.60% | 26.29% |
Financials
LU vs. GDOT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lufax Holding Ltd and Green Dot Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LU and GDOT have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LU has higher volatility (12.14%) compared to GDOT (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LU dropped -96.68% vs GDOT's -93.17%.
GDOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LU and GDOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer