LTBR vs. WULF
LTBR (Lightbridge Corporation) and WULF (TeraWulf Inc.) are both stocks. LTBR operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while WULF operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, LTBR returned -9.07%/yr vs 10.67%/yr for WULF. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LTBR vs. WULF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTBR achieves a -24.84% return, which is significantly lower than WULF's 125.07% return. Over the past 10 years, LTBR has underperformed WULF with an annualized return of -9.07%, while WULF has yielded a comparatively higher 10.67% annualized return.
LTBR
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -29.26%
- YTD
- -24.84%
- 6M
- -43.92%
- 1Y
- -39.68%
- 3Y*
- 25.47%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- -9.07%
WULF
- 1D
- 7.75%
- 1M
- 10.56%
- YTD
- 125.07%
- 6M
- 72.86%
- 1Y
- 494.48%
- 3Y*
- 168.90%
- 5Y*
- 22.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
LTBR vs. WULF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTBR Lightbridge Corporation | -24.84% | 167.23% | 47.35% | -17.48% | -41.28% | 56.62% | -6.00% | -31.19% | -55.33% | 7.02% |
WULF TeraWulf Inc. | 125.07% | 103.00% | 135.83% | 260.58% | -95.58% | 77.08% | 86.34% | -36.55% | 12.13% | -33.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between LTBR and WULF is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2000 | 0.11 |
Over the past year, LTBR and WULF have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
LTBR:
$304.42M
WULF:
$10.94B
LTBR:
-$0.84
WULF:
-$2.55
LTBR:
$0.00
WULF:
$168.06M
LTBR:
$0.00
WULF:
$107.59M
LTBR:
-$11.77M
WULF:
-$132.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LTBR vs. WULF — Risk / Return Rank
LTBR
WULF
LTBR vs. WULF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) and TeraWulf Inc. (WULF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LTBR | WULF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.51 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 15.71 | -16.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 41.48 | -42.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LTBR | WULF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.40 | 4.72 | -5.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.18 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.09 | 0.11 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.11 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
LTBR vs. WULF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTBR drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, roughly equal to the maximum WULF drawdown of -98.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTBR and WULF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTBR | WULF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -98.50% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.04% | -31.74% | -34.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.04% | -75.77% | +9.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.72% | -98.50% | +14.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.69% | -98.50% | +2.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.77% | -28.31% | -71.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -95.02% | -46.67% | -48.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.74% | 12.00% | +27.74% |
Volatility
LTBR vs. WULF - Volatility Comparison
Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) has a higher volatility of 26.37% compared to TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) at 21.75%. This indicates that LTBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WULF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LTBR | WULF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.37% | 21.75% | +4.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.74% | 64.60% | -3.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 100.20% | 105.83% | -5.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 109.14% | 127.48% | -18.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 106.15% | 101.40% | +4.75% |
Dividends
LTBR vs. WULF - Dividend Comparison
Neither LTBR nor WULF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTBR Lightbridge Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WULF TeraWulf Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 33.22% |
Financials
LTBR vs. WULF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lightbridge Corporation and TeraWulf Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LTBR and WULF have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LTBR has higher volatility (26.37%) compared to WULF (21.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTBR dropped -99.96% vs WULF's -98.50%.
WULF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.72 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LTBR and WULF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer