PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTBR vs. NEE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LTBR vs. NEE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) and NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTBR achieves a -24.84% return, which is significantly lower than NEE's 6.13% return. Over the past 10 years, LTBR has underperformed NEE with an annualized return of -9.07%, while NEE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.35% annualized return.


LTBR

1D
0.90%
1M
-29.26%
YTD
-24.84%
6M
-43.92%
1Y
-39.68%
3Y*
25.47%
5Y*
7.20%
10Y*
-9.07%

NEE

1D
-2.13%
1M
-9.10%
YTD
6.13%
6M
5.78%
1Y
19.79%
3Y*
7.41%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
13.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTBR vs. NEE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTBR
Lightbridge Corporation
-24.84%167.23%47.35%-17.48%-41.28%56.62%-6.00%-31.19%-55.33%7.02%
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
6.13%15.47%21.46%-25.30%-8.54%23.39%30.06%42.69%14.30%34.39%

Correlation

The correlation between LTBR and NEE is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2003

0.05

Fundamentals

EPS

LTBR:

-$0.84

NEE:

$5.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

LTBR:

$0.00

NEE:

$27.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LTBR:

$0.00

NEE:

$13.35B

EBITDA (TTM)

LTBR:

-$11.77M

NEE:

$14.56B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTBR vs. NEE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTBR
LTBR Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LTBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTBR Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
LTBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTBR Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

NEE
NEE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
NEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
NEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTBR vs. NEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) and NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTBRNEEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.17

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.60

1.37

-1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.00

3.95

-4.95

LTBR vs. NEE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTBR Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the NEE Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTBR and NEE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTBRNEEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

0.84

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.21

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

0.53

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.13

0.61

-0.74

Drawdowns

LTBR vs. NEE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTBR drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than NEE's maximum drawdown of -47.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTBR and NEE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTBRNEEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.96%

-47.81%

-52.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.04%

-14.53%

-51.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.04%

-34.57%

-31.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.72%

-44.97%

-38.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.69%

-44.97%

-50.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.77%

-13.54%

-86.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-95.02%

-8.92%

-86.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.74%

5.02%

+34.72%

Volatility

LTBR vs. NEE - Volatility Comparison

Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) has a higher volatility of 26.37% compared to NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) at 8.52%. This indicates that LTBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTBRNEEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.37%

8.52%

+17.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.74%

17.13%

+43.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

100.20%

23.81%

+76.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

109.14%

26.92%

+82.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

106.15%

25.49%

+80.66%

Dividends

LTBR vs. NEE - Dividend Comparison

LTBR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTBR
Lightbridge Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
2.83%2.82%2.87%3.08%2.03%1.65%1.81%2.06%2.55%2.52%2.91%2.96%

Financials

LTBR vs. NEE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lightbridge Corporation and NextEra Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B202220232024202520260
6.70B
(LTBR) Total Revenue
(NEE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LTBR and NEE have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LTBR has higher volatility (26.37%) compared to NEE (8.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTBR dropped -99.96% vs NEE's -47.81%.

NEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTBR and NEE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer