LTBR vs. ASML

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

LTBR (Lightbridge Corporation) and ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) are both stocks. LTBR operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while ASML operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, LTBR returned -9.07%/yr vs 34.75%/yr for ASML. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LTBR vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTBR achieves a -24.84% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 64.06% return. Over the past 10 years, LTBR has underperformed ASML with an annualized return of -9.07%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively higher 34.75% annualized return.

LTBR

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -29.26%
• YTD: -24.84%
• 6M: -43.92%
• 1Y: -39.68%
• 3Y*: 25.47%
• 5Y*: 7.20%
• 10Y*: -9.07%

ASML

• 1D: 6.54%
• 1M: 9.86%
• YTD: 64.06%
• 6M: 56.76%
• 1Y: 134.10%
• 3Y*: 36.05%
• 5Y*: 21.93%
• 10Y*: 34.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTBR vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LTBR Lightbridge Corporation	-24.84%	167.23%	47.35%	-17.48%	-41.28%	56.62%	-6.00%	-31.19%	-55.33%	7.02%
ASML ASML Holding N.V.	64.06%	56.51%	-7.70%	39.91%	-30.49%	64.13%	66.06%	93.56%	-9.80%	56.23%

Correlation

The correlation between LTBR and ASML is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2000	0.11

Over the past year, LTBR and ASML have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap LTBR : $304.42M ASML : $674.60B
EPS LTBR : -$0.84 ASML : $25.86
PB Ratio LTBR : 1.40 ASML : 32.39
Total Revenue (TTM) LTBR : $0.00 ASML : $33.69B
Gross Profit (TTM) LTBR : $0.00 ASML : $17.72B
EBITDA (TTM) LTBR : -$11.77M ASML : $12.99B

Return for Risk

LTBR vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTBR

LTBR Risk / Return Rank: 26
LTBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
LTBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
LTBR Omega Ratio Rank: 31
LTBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
LTBR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

ASML

ASML Risk / Return Rank: 95
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 92
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTBR vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LTBR	ASML	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.40	3.24	-3.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.02	3.63	-3.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.45	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.60	7.56	-8.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.00	20.33	-21.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LTBR vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTBR Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTBR and ASML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LTBR	ASML	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.40	3.24	-3.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	0.52	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.09	0.90	-0.99
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.13	0.56	-0.69

Drawdowns

LTBR vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTBR drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than ASML's maximum drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTBR and ASML.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTBR	ASML	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.96%	-90.00%	-9.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-66.04%	-17.85%	-48.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-66.04%	-45.38%	-20.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-83.72%	-56.84%	-26.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.69%	-56.84%	-38.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.77%	-0.48%	-99.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-95.02%	-28.14%	-66.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.74%	6.62%	+33.12%

Volatility

LTBR vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) has a higher volatility of 26.37% compared to ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) at 15.94%. This indicates that LTBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTBR	ASML	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.37%	15.94%	+10.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	60.74%	33.30%	+27.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	100.20%	41.73%	+58.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	109.14%	42.23%	+66.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	106.15%	38.62%	+67.53%

Dividends

LTBR vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

LTBR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASML ASML Holding N.V.	0.50%	0.97%	0.97%	0.86%	1.27%	0.50%	0.50%	1.40%	0.94%	0.64%	0.92%	0.73%
LTBR Lightbridge Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTBR and ASML in my portfolio?

LTBR and ASML have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LTBR or ASML?

LTBR has higher volatility (26.37%) compared to ASML (15.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTBR dropped -99.96% vs ASML's -90.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.