PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRCX vs. LPLA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LRCX vs. LPLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a 89.76% return, which is significantly higher than LPLA's -20.40% return. Over the past 10 years, LRCX has outperformed LPLA with an annualized return of 46.35%, while LPLA has yielded a comparatively lower 29.01% annualized return.


LRCX

1D
6.98%
1M
10.34%
YTD
89.76%
6M
99.61%
1Y
278.49%
3Y*
76.58%
5Y*
40.10%
10Y*
46.35%

LPLA

1D
-1.65%
1M
-6.42%
YTD
-20.40%
6M
-22.85%
1Y
-26.79%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
15.99%
10Y*
29.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRCX vs. LPLA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
89.76%139.16%-6.84%88.63%-40.72%53.66%64.18%119.33%-24.40%76.21%
LPLA
LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
-20.40%9.76%44.12%5.88%35.69%54.63%14.58%52.95%8.53%66.03%

Correlation

The correlation between LRCX and LPLA is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2010

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between LRCX and LPLA has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LRCX:

$409.71B

LPLA:

$22.82B

EPS

LRCX:

$5.29

LPLA:

$11.30

PE Ratio

LRCX:

61.36

LPLA:

25.11

PEG Ratio

LRCX:

4.64

LPLA:

1.06

PS Ratio

LRCX:

18.98

LPLA:

1.24

PB Ratio

LRCX:

38.71

LPLA:

4.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

LRCX:

$21.68B

LPLA:

$18.26B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LRCX:

$10.84B

LPLA:

$7.58B

EBITDA (TTM)

LRCX:

$6.10B

LPLA:

$2.23B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRCX vs. LPLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRCX
LRCX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
LRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

LPLA
LPLA Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
LPLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LPLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
LPLA Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
LPLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
LPLA Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRCX vs. LPLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LRCXLPLADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

0.89

+0.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.02

-0.81

+14.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

47.19

-1.70

+48.88

LRCX vs. LPLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRCX Sharpe Ratio is 5.46, which is higher than the LPLA Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRCX and LPLA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LRCXLPLADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.46

-0.75

+6.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.45

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

0.76

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.47

-0.04

Drawdowns

LRCX vs. LPLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.90%, which is greater than LPLA's maximum drawdown of -69.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and LPLA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRCXLPLADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.90%

-69.32%

-18.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.01%

-33.12%

+13.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.10%

-33.18%

-13.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.39%

-33.18%

-23.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.39%

-60.34%

+3.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.60%

-28.63%

+23.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.18%

-13.91%

-14.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.93%

15.84%

-9.91%

Volatility

LRCX vs. LPLA - Volatility Comparison

Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a higher volatility of 18.51% compared to LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA) at 10.60%. This indicates that LRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LPLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRCXLPLADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.51%

10.60%

+7.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.13%

27.76%

+14.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.52%

36.06%

+15.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.25%

36.03%

+10.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.76%

38.12%

+6.64%

Dividends

LRCX vs. LPLA - Dividend Comparison

LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than LPLA's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LPLA
LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
0.42%0.34%0.37%0.53%0.46%0.62%0.96%1.08%1.64%1.75%2.84%2.34%
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
0.31%0.57%1.19%0.95%1.53%0.78%1.04%1.54%2.79%1.01%1.28%1.36%

Financials

LRCX vs. LPLA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lam Research Corporation and LPL Financial Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
5.84B
4.94B
(LRCX) Total Revenue
(LPLA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LRCX vs. LPLA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lam Research Corporation and LPL Financial Holdings Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
49.8%
91.5%
Portfolio components
LRCX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.

LPLA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LPL Financial Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.52B and revenue of 4.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.5%.

LRCX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

LPLA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LPL Financial Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 4.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

LRCX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.

LPLA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LPL Financial Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 356.40M and revenue of 4.94B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LRCX and LPLA have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LRCX has higher volatility (18.51%) compared to LPLA (10.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRCX dropped -87.90% vs LPLA's -69.32%.

LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.46 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRCX and LPLA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer