LRCX vs. ISVL
LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) is a stock, while ISVL (iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF) is Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex US ex Korea Small Cap Focused Value Index. Over the past 5 years, LRCX returned 40.10%/yr vs 10.12%/yr for ISVL. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
LRCX vs. ISVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a 89.76% return, which is significantly higher than ISVL's 7.99% return.
LRCX
- 1D
- 6.98%
- 1M
- 10.34%
- YTD
- 89.76%
- 6M
- 99.61%
- 1Y
- 278.49%
- 3Y*
- 76.58%
- 5Y*
- 40.10%
- 10Y*
- 46.35%
ISVL
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- YTD
- 7.99%
- 6M
- 11.55%
- 1Y
- 27.06%
- 3Y*
- 20.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.12%
- 10Y*
- —
LRCX vs. ISVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 89.76% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 32.10% |
ISVL iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF | 7.99% | 42.84% | 4.58% | 17.56% | -13.69% | 7.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCX and ISVL is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021 | 0.51 |
The correlation between LRCX and ISVL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCX vs. ISVL — Risk / Return Rank
LRCX
ISVL
LRCX vs. ISVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LRCX | ISVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.34 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.02 | 2.18 | +11.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 47.19 | 8.52 | +38.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LRCX | ISVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.46 | 1.87 | +3.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.60 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.69 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
LRCX vs. ISVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.90%, which is greater than ISVL's maximum drawdown of -30.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and ISVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCX | ISVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.90% | -30.48% | -57.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.01% | -12.48% | -7.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.10% | -12.93% | -34.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.39% | -30.48% | -25.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.60% | -2.58% | -3.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.18% | -6.65% | -21.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.93% | 3.19% | +2.74% |
Volatility
LRCX vs. ISVL - Volatility Comparison
Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a higher volatility of 18.51% compared to iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL) at 4.21%. This indicates that LRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCX | ISVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.51% | 4.21% | +14.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.13% | 12.16% | +29.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.52% | 14.57% | +36.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.25% | 16.91% | +29.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.76% | 16.78% | +27.98% |
Dividends
LRCX vs. ISVL - Dividend Comparison
LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than ISVL's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISVL iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF | 2.49% | 2.69% | 3.92% | 3.82% | 3.37% | 2.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.31% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCX and ISVL have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRCX has higher volatility (18.51%) compared to ISVL (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRCX dropped -87.90% vs ISVL's -30.48%.
LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.46 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LRCX and ISVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer