LRCX vs. BDT.TO
LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) and BDT.TO (Bird Construction Inc.) are both stocks. LRCX operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while BDT.TO operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, LRCX returned 46.35%/yr vs 20.28%/yr for BDT.TO. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LRCX vs. BDT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LRCX is traded in USD, while BDT.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the BDT.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a 89.76% return, which is significantly lower than BDT.TO's 108.38% return. Over the past 10 years, LRCX has outperformed BDT.TO with an annualized return of 46.35%, while BDT.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 20.28% annualized return.
LRCX
- 1D
- 6.98%
- 1M
- 10.34%
- YTD
- 89.76%
- 6M
- 99.61%
- 1Y
- 278.49%
- 3Y*
- 76.58%
- 5Y*
- 40.10%
- 10Y*
- 46.35%
BDT.TO
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 9.96%
- YTD
- 108.38%
- 6M
- 117.99%
- 1Y
- 119.78%
- 3Y*
- 95.26%
- 5Y*
- 45.62%
- 10Y*
- 20.28%
LRCX vs. BDT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 89.76% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 53.66% | 64.18% | 119.33% | -24.40% | 76.21% |
BDT.TO Bird Construction Inc. | 108.38% | 18.52% | 71.18% | 89.77% | -18.12% | 28.11% | 22.11% | 29.91% | -41.45% | 25.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCX and BDT.TO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006 | 0.22 |
The correlation between LRCX and BDT.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LRCX:
$409.71B
BDT.TO:
CA$3.32B
LRCX:
$5.29
BDT.TO:
CA$0.89
LRCX:
61.36
BDT.TO:
67.21
LRCX:
4.64
BDT.TO:
6.06
LRCX:
18.98
BDT.TO:
0.96
LRCX:
38.71
BDT.TO:
7.70
LRCX:
$21.68B
BDT.TO:
CA$3.46B
LRCX:
$10.84B
BDT.TO:
CA$334.40M
LRCX:
$6.10B
BDT.TO:
CA$190.07M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCX vs. BDT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
LRCX
BDT.TO
LRCX vs. BDT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LRCX | BDT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.52 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.02 | 4.75 | +9.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 47.19 | 14.65 | +32.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LRCX | BDT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.46 | 2.96 | +2.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 1.30 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | 0.59 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.60 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
LRCX vs. BDT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.90%, which is greater than BDT.TO's maximum drawdown of -74.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and BDT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCX | BDT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.90% | -74.67% | -13.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.01% | -25.38% | +5.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.10% | -44.76% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.39% | -48.16% | -8.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.39% | -67.08% | +10.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.60% | -6.86% | +1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.18% | -23.64% | -4.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.93% | 8.21% | -2.28% |
Volatility
LRCX vs. BDT.TO - Volatility Comparison
Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO) have volatilities of 18.51% and 18.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCX | BDT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.51% | 18.17% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.13% | 27.71% | +14.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.52% | 40.81% | +10.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.25% | 35.31% | +10.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.76% | 34.71% | +10.05% |
Dividends
LRCX vs. BDT.TO - Dividend Comparison
LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than BDT.TO's 1.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDT.TO Bird Construction Inc. | 1.40% | 2.95% | 2.25% | 2.94% | 4.85% | 3.97% | 4.89% | 5.45% | 6.38% | 3.85% | 8.38% | 5.84% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.31% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
Financials
LRCX vs. BDT.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lam Research Corporation and Bird Construction Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LRCX vs. BDT.TO - Profitability Comparison
LRCX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.
BDT.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bird Construction Inc. reported a gross profit of 60.15M and revenue of 783.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.7%.
LRCX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.
BDT.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bird Construction Inc. reported an operating income of 41.72M and revenue of 783.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.
LRCX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.
BDT.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bird Construction Inc. reported a net income of 11.40M and revenue of 783.37M, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCX and BDT.TO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LRCX and BDT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer