LQDH vs. BTCE.DE
LQDH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) and BTCE.DE (ETC Group Physical Bitcoin) are both exchange-traded funds - LQDH is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by iShares, while BTCE.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ETC Issuance. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, LQDH returned 5.25%/yr vs 9.35%/yr for BTCE.DE. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LQDH charges 0.25%/yr vs 2.00%/yr for BTCE.DE.
Performance
LQDH vs. BTCE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LQDH is traded in USD, while BTCE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the BTCE.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQDH achieves a 2.17% return, which is significantly higher than BTCE.DE's -27.87% return.
LQDH
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 2.17%
- 6M
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 7.27%
- 3Y*
- 8.07%
- 5Y*
- 5.25%
- 10Y*
- 4.63%
BTCE.DE
- 1D
- -3.69%
- 1M
- -20.23%
- YTD
- -27.87%
- 6M
- -28.92%
- 1Y
- -40.39%
- 3Y*
- 31.53%
- 5Y*
- 9.35%
- 10Y*
- —
LQDH vs. BTCE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 2.17% | 7.00% | 7.43% | 11.14% | -1.88% | 1.84% | 7.49% |
BTCE.DE ETC Group Physical Bitcoin | -27.87% | -7.65% | 112.88% | 154.31% | -65.88% | 67.06% | 187.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQDH and BTCE.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020 | 0.20 |
The correlation between LQDH and BTCE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (3 years) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQDH vs. BTCE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LQDH
BTCE.DE
LQDH vs. BTCE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) and ETC Group Physical Bitcoin (BTCE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LQDH | BTCE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 0.84 | +0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | -0.82 | +3.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.21 | -1.42 | +14.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LQDH | BTCE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | -1.01 | +3.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.19 | 0.17 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.59 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
LQDH vs. BTCE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQDH drawdown since its inception was -24.63%, smaller than the maximum BTCE.DE drawdown of -77.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDH and BTCE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQDH | BTCE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.63% | -77.07% | +52.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.34% | -49.71% | +47.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.86% | -49.71% | +44.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.08% | -77.07% | +69.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -49.71% | +49.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -31.24% | +29.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | 28.63% | -28.08% |
Volatility
LQDH vs. BTCE.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) is 0.47%, while ETC Group Physical Bitcoin (BTCE.DE) has a volatility of 9.77%. This indicates that LQDH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQDH | BTCE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.47% | 9.77% | -9.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.04% | 31.28% | -29.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71% | 39.98% | -37.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.41% | 53.24% | -48.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.44% | 58.58% | -52.14% |
LQDH vs. BTCE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQDH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCE.DE's 2.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
LQDH vs. BTCE.DE - Dividend Comparison
LQDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.96%, while BTCE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCE.DE ETC Group Physical Bitcoin | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 5.96% | 6.06% | 7.57% | 7.69% | 3.73% | 1.65% | 2.22% | 3.09% | 5.08% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LQDH and BTCE.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQDH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQDH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 2.00% for BTCE.DE.
LQDH is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BTCE.DE is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ETC Issuance. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LQDH and 2.00% for BTCE.DE.
Find the right allocation for LQDH and BTCE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer