PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LPLA vs. MAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LPLA vs. MAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LPLA achieves a -20.40% return, which is significantly lower than MAR's 26.66% return. Over the past 10 years, LPLA has outperformed MAR with an annualized return of 29.01%, while MAR has yielded a comparatively lower 20.49% annualized return.


LPLA

1D
-1.65%
1M
-6.42%
YTD
-20.40%
6M
-22.85%
1Y
-26.79%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
15.99%
10Y*
29.01%

MAR

1D
-0.28%
1M
11.05%
YTD
26.66%
6M
36.53%
1Y
48.66%
3Y*
31.04%
5Y*
23.16%
10Y*
20.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LPLA vs. MAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LPLA
LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
-20.40%9.76%44.12%5.88%35.69%54.63%14.58%52.95%8.53%66.03%
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
26.66%12.31%24.92%53.06%-9.34%25.26%-12.53%41.49%-19.05%66.24%

Correlation

The correlation between LPLA and MAR is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2010

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between LPLA and MAR has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

LPLA:

$11.30

MAR:

$12.66

PE Ratio

LPLA:

25.11

MAR:

30.92

PEG Ratio

LPLA:

1.06

MAR:

0.81

PS Ratio

LPLA:

1.24

MAR:

3.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

LPLA:

$18.26B

MAR:

$21.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LPLA:

$7.58B

MAR:

$1.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

LPLA:

$2.23B

MAR:

$3.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LPLA vs. MAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LPLA
LPLA Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
LPLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LPLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
LPLA Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
LPLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
LPLA Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

MAR
MAR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LPLA vs. MAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LPLAMARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.32

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

3.87

-4.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.70

9.70

-11.39

LPLA vs. MAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LPLA Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the MAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LPLA and MAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LPLAMARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.75

1.87

-2.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.81

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.63

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.47

0.00

Drawdowns

LPLA vs. MAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LPLA drawdown since its inception was -69.32%, smaller than the maximum MAR drawdown of -75.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPLA and MAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LPLAMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.32%

-75.59%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.12%

-12.65%

-20.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.18%

-30.50%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.18%

-30.50%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.34%

-61.26%

+0.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.63%

-0.28%

-28.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.91%

-14.91%

+1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.84%

5.03%

+10.81%

Volatility

LPLA vs. MAR - Volatility Comparison

LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA) has a higher volatility of 10.60% compared to Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) at 6.25%. This indicates that LPLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LPLAMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.60%

6.25%

+4.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.76%

19.86%

+7.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.06%

26.15%

+9.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.03%

28.82%

+7.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.12%

32.89%

+5.23%

Dividends

LPLA vs. MAR - Dividend Comparison

LPLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than MAR's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LPLA
LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
0.42%0.34%0.37%0.53%0.46%0.62%0.96%1.08%1.64%1.75%2.84%2.34%
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
0.70%0.85%0.86%0.87%0.67%0.00%0.36%1.22%1.44%0.95%1.39%1.42%

Financials

LPLA vs. MAR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LPL Financial Holdings Inc. and Marriott International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
4.94B
1.81B
(LPLA) Total Revenue
(MAR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LPLA and MAR have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LPLA has higher volatility (10.60%) compared to MAR (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPLA dropped -69.32% vs MAR's -75.59%.

MAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LPLA and MAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer