PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LPLA vs. FISV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LPLA vs. FISV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA) and Fiserv, Inc (FISV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LPLA achieves a -20.40% return, which is significantly higher than FISV's -21.51% return. Over the past 10 years, LPLA has outperformed FISV with an annualized return of 29.01%, while FISV has yielded a comparatively lower -0.09% annualized return.


LPLA

1D
-1.65%
1M
-6.42%
YTD
-20.40%
6M
-22.85%
1Y
-26.79%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
15.99%
10Y*
29.01%

FISV

1D
-3.14%
1M
-4.97%
YTD
-21.51%
6M
-19.79%
1Y
-68.38%
3Y*
-23.30%
5Y*
-13.85%
10Y*
-0.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LPLA vs. FISV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LPLA
LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
-20.40%9.76%44.12%5.88%35.69%54.63%14.58%52.95%8.53%66.03%
FISV
Fiserv, Inc
-21.51%-67.30%54.64%31.43%-2.62%-8.84%-1.53%57.34%12.09%23.38%

Correlation

The correlation between LPLA and FISV is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2010

0.38

The correlation between LPLA and FISV shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LPLA:

$22.82B

FISV:

$28.23B

EPS

LPLA:

$11.30

FISV:

$5.91

PE Ratio

LPLA:

25.11

FISV:

8.92

PEG Ratio

LPLA:

1.06

FISV:

0.24

PS Ratio

LPLA:

1.24

FISV:

1.35

PB Ratio

LPLA:

4.01

FISV:

1.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

LPLA:

$18.26B

FISV:

$21.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LPLA:

$7.58B

FISV:

$9.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

LPLA:

$2.23B

FISV:

$7.75B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LPLA vs. FISV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LPLA
LPLA Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
LPLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LPLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
LPLA Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
LPLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
LPLA Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

FISV
FISV Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FISV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISV Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISV Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FISV Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISV Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LPLA vs. FISV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA) and Fiserv, Inc (FISV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LPLAFISVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

0.64

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

-0.98

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.70

-1.31

-0.39

LPLA vs. FISV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LPLA Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is higher than the FISV Sharpe Ratio of -1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LPLA and FISV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LPLAFISVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.75

-1.23

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

-0.39

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

-0.00

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.41

+0.06

Drawdowns

LPLA vs. FISV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LPLA drawdown since its inception was -69.32%, smaller than the maximum FISV drawdown of -77.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPLA and FISV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LPLAFISVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.32%

-77.98%

+8.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.12%

-70.17%

+37.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.18%

-77.98%

+44.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.18%

-77.98%

+44.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.34%

-77.98%

+17.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.63%

-77.83%

+49.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.91%

-11.15%

-2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.84%

52.12%

-36.28%

Volatility

LPLA vs. FISV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA) is 10.60%, while Fiserv, Inc (FISV) has a volatility of 12.06%. This indicates that LPLA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LPLAFISVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.60%

12.06%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.76%

26.32%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.06%

56.01%

-19.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.03%

35.60%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.12%

31.62%

+6.50%

Dividends

LPLA vs. FISV - Dividend Comparison

LPLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while FISV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FISV
Fiserv, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LPLA
LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
0.42%0.34%0.37%0.53%0.46%0.62%0.96%1.08%1.64%1.75%2.84%2.34%

Financials

LPLA vs. FISV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LPL Financial Holdings Inc. and Fiserv, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
4.94B
5.03B
(LPLA) Total Revenue
(FISV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LPLA vs. FISV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LPL Financial Holdings Inc. and Fiserv, Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
91.5%
0
Portfolio components
LPLA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LPL Financial Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.52B and revenue of 4.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.5%.

FISV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fiserv, Inc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LPLA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LPL Financial Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 4.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

FISV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fiserv, Inc reported an operating income of 918.00M and revenue of 5.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.3%.

LPLA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LPL Financial Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 356.40M and revenue of 4.94B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.

FISV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fiserv, Inc reported a net income of 571.00M and revenue of 5.03B, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LPLA and FISV have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FISV has higher volatility (12.06%) compared to LPLA (10.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPLA dropped -69.32% vs FISV's -77.98%.

LPLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.75 vs -1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LPLA and FISV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer