LOW vs. STZ
LOW (Lowe's Companies, Inc.) and STZ (Constellation Brands, Inc.) are both stocks. LOW operates in Home Improvement Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while STZ operates in Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, LOW returned 12.33%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for STZ. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LOW vs. STZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOW achieves a -12.96% return, which is significantly lower than STZ's 3.44% return. Over the past 10 years, LOW has outperformed STZ with an annualized return of 12.33%, while STZ has yielded a comparatively lower 0.71% annualized return.
LOW
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -9.26%
- YTD
- -12.96%
- 6M
- -14.26%
- 1Y
- -5.86%
- 3Y*
- 1.78%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.33%
STZ
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -4.97%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 0.51%
- 1Y
- -15.85%
- 3Y*
- -14.74%
- 5Y*
- -8.24%
- 10Y*
- 0.71%
LOW vs. STZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOW Lowe's Companies, Inc. | -12.96% | -0.33% | 13.01% | 14.03% | -21.49% | 63.34% | 36.40% | 32.23% | 1.22% | 33.29% |
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 3.44% | -35.99% | -7.11% | 5.83% | -6.43% | 16.12% | 17.41% | 19.85% | -28.73% | 50.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOW and STZ is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 1992 | 0.27 |
Fundamentals
LOW:
$116.46B
STZ:
$24.46B
LOW:
$11.86
STZ:
$11.23
LOW:
17.54
STZ:
12.54
LOW:
19.16
STZ:
7.81
LOW:
1.32
STZ:
2.69
LOW:
$88.43B
STZ:
$9.14B
LOW:
$29.89B
STZ:
$4.71B
LOW:
$11.50B
STZ:
$3.05B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOW vs. STZ — Risk / Return Rank
LOW
STZ
LOW vs. STZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOW | STZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 0.93 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | -0.60 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.49 | -1.07 | +0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOW | STZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 | -0.53 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | -0.34 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.03 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.45 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
LOW vs. STZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOW drawdown since its inception was -62.52%, smaller than the maximum STZ drawdown of -67.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOW and STZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOW | STZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.52% | -67.39% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.75% | -26.51% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.75% | -51.28% | +23.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.86% | -51.28% | +17.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.63% | -53.53% | +4.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.29% | -45.54% | +18.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.60% | -16.58% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.96% | 14.89% | -2.93% |
Volatility
LOW vs. STZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) is 6.36%, while Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) has a volatility of 8.70%. This indicates that LOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOW | STZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.36% | 8.70% | -2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.88% | 23.49% | -3.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.77% | 29.97% | -4.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.15% | 24.50% | +1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.14% | 26.94% | +2.20% |
Dividends
LOW vs. STZ - Dividend Comparison
LOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than STZ's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOW Lowe's Companies, Inc. | 2.31% | 1.95% | 1.82% | 1.93% | 1.86% | 1.08% | 1.40% | 1.72% | 1.93% | 1.64% | 1.77% | 1.34% |
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 2.90% | 2.95% | 1.77% | 1.44% | 1.36% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 1.58% | 1.70% | 0.86% | 0.98% | 0.65% |
Financials
LOW vs. STZ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lowe's Companies, Inc. and Constellation Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LOW vs. STZ - Profitability Comparison
LOW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lowe's Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.54B and revenue of 23.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.
STZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 941.60M and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.
LOW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lowe's Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.55B and revenue of 23.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.
STZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 357.10M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.
LOW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lowe's Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 1.63B and revenue of 23.08B, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
STZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 477.70M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 24.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LOW and STZ have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STZ has higher volatility (8.70%) compared to LOW (6.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOW dropped -62.52% vs STZ's -67.39%.
LOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.23 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOW and STZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer