LOMA vs. BMA
LOMA (Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima) and BMA (Banco Macro S.A.) are both stocks. LOMA operates in Building Materials (Basic Materials), while BMA operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, LOMA returned 17.14%/yr vs 45.54%/yr for BMA. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
LOMA vs. BMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOMA achieves a -15.14% return, which is significantly lower than BMA's -3.84% return.
LOMA
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- -15.14%
- 6M
- -8.80%
- 1Y
- -9.02%
- 3Y*
- 21.52%
- 5Y*
- 17.14%
- 10Y*
- —
BMA
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 15.77%
- YTD
- -3.84%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 17.30%
- 3Y*
- 71.64%
- 5Y*
- 45.54%
- 10Y*
- 6.52%
LOMA vs. BMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOMA Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima | -15.14% | 8.46% | 68.41% | 21.03% | 26.57% | 8.46% | -16.62% | -29.74% | -51.69% | 6.42% |
BMA Banco Macro S.A. | -3.84% | -3.55% | 277.79% | 91.62% | 27.04% | -9.96% | -57.05% | -14.00% | -60.72% | -7.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOMA and BMA is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2017 | 0.61 |
The correlation between LOMA and BMA shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LOMA:
$1.28B
BMA:
$5.37B
LOMA:
$336.44
BMA:
$5.81K
LOMA:
0.03
BMA:
0.01
LOMA:
0.00
BMA:
0.00
LOMA:
0.00
BMA:
0.00
LOMA:
0.00
BMA:
0.00
LOMA:
$829.94B
BMA:
$4.76T
LOMA:
$182.35B
BMA:
$2.84T
LOMA:
$174.03B
BMA:
$751.84B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOMA vs. BMA — Risk / Return Rank
LOMA
BMA
LOMA vs. BMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA) and Banco Macro S.A. (BMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOMA | BMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.12 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 0.36 | -0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.47 | 0.78 | -1.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOMA | BMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 | 0.24 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.77 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.19 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
LOMA vs. BMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOMA drawdown since its inception was -87.17%, roughly equal to the maximum BMA drawdown of -91.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOMA and BMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOMA | BMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.17% | -91.66% | +4.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.87% | -48.89% | +6.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.26% | -65.40% | +17.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.26% | -65.40% | +17.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -91.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.89% | -22.54% | -10.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.05% | -44.84% | -12.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.15% | 22.09% | -2.94% |
Volatility
LOMA vs. BMA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA) is 14.89%, while Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) has a volatility of 16.39%. This indicates that LOMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOMA | BMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.89% | 16.39% | -1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.25% | 38.04% | -7.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.07% | 73.76% | -15.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.87% | 59.42% | -13.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.19% | 62.27% | -7.08% |
Dividends
LOMA vs. BMA - Dividend Comparison
LOMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 5.70% | 2.38% | 6.10% | 7.75% | 7.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.20% | 5.05% | 0.65% | 1.53% |
LOMA Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.64% | 15.68% | 0.00% | 4.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LOMA vs. BMA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima and Banco Macro S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LOMA vs. BMA - Profitability Comparison
LOMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima reported a gross profit of 57.03B and revenue of 218.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.1%.
BMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.17T and revenue of 1.91T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.1%.
LOMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima reported an operating income of 30.51B and revenue of 218.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.
BMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported an operating income of 212.69B and revenue of 1.91T, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
LOMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima reported a net income of 41.00B and revenue of 218.74B, resulting in a net margin of 18.8%.
BMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported a net income of 140.24B and revenue of 1.91T, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LOMA and BMA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BMA has higher volatility (16.39%) compared to LOMA (14.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOMA dropped -87.17% vs BMA's -91.66%.
BMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOMA and BMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer