PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMP.L vs. COV.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LMP.L vs. COV.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L) and Covivio SA (COV.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LMP.L is traded in GBp, while COV.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the COV.PA values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMP.L achieves a -2.47% return, which is significantly higher than COV.PA's -3.60% return. Over the past 10 years, LMP.L has outperformed COV.PA with an annualized return of 6.10%, while COV.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 1.52% annualized return.


LMP.L

1D
-0.72%
1M
-3.52%
YTD
-2.47%
6M
1.04%
1Y
-3.25%
3Y*
4.85%
5Y*
-0.05%
10Y*
6.10%

COV.PA

1D
0.73%
1M
-3.20%
YTD
-3.60%
6M
1.02%
1Y
10.07%
3Y*
9.16%
5Y*
-3.07%
10Y*
1.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMP.L vs. COV.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMP.L
LondonMetric Property plc
-2.47%12.48%-0.43%17.21%-36.54%28.33%0.54%41.57%-2.30%25.29%
COV.PA
Covivio SA
-3.60%24.85%2.86%-9.83%-14.85%-5.37%-14.42%18.98%-5.59%20.19%

Correlation

The correlation between LMP.L and COV.PA is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2013

0.50

The correlation between LMP.L and COV.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMP.L vs. COV.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMP.L
LMP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
LMP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
LMP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

COV.PA
COV.PA Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
COV.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COV.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
COV.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
COV.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
COV.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMP.L vs. COV.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L) and Covivio SA (COV.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMP.LCOV.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.10

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

0.57

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.42

1.44

-1.86

LMP.L vs. COV.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMP.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the COV.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMP.L and COV.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMP.LCOV.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

0.46

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

-0.11

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.05

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.11

+0.28

Drawdowns

LMP.L vs. COV.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMP.L drawdown since its inception was -42.13%, smaller than the maximum COV.PA drawdown of -59.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMP.L and COV.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMP.LCOV.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.13%

-59.63%

+17.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.39%

-17.70%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.22%

-20.30%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.56%

-49.11%

+7.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.13%

-59.63%

+17.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.27%

-29.35%

+10.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.15%

-20.30%

+10.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.65%

7.00%

+0.65%

Volatility

LMP.L vs. COV.PA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L) is 4.46%, while Covivio SA (COV.PA) has a volatility of 5.56%. This indicates that LMP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COV.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMP.LCOV.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

5.56%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.44%

18.40%

-3.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.65%

21.67%

-4.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.54%

27.07%

-2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.12%

29.57%

-5.45%

Dividends

LMP.L vs. COV.PA - Dividend Comparison

LMP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.96%, more than COV.PA's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COV.PA
Covivio SA
2.80%1.79%6.77%5.05%6.76%4.99%6.37%4.55%5.34%1.09%3.72%1.58%
LMP.L
LondonMetric Property plc
6.96%6.54%6.16%5.07%5.48%3.12%3.71%3.55%4.60%4.09%4.73%3.35%

Financials

LMP.L vs. COV.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LondonMetric Property plc and Covivio SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. LMP.L values in GBp, COV.PA values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


LMP.L and COV.PA have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMP.L and COV.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer