LLY vs. WFC
LLY (Eli Lilly and Company) and WFC (Wells Fargo & Company) are both stocks. LLY operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare), while WFC operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, LLY returned 33.71%/yr vs 8.26%/yr for WFC. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LLY vs. WFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LLY achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly higher than WFC's -12.21% return. Over the past 10 years, LLY has outperformed WFC with an annualized return of 33.71%, while WFC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.26% annualized return.
LLY
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- 21.37%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 6M
- 15.58%
- 1Y
- 50.32%
- 3Y*
- 38.07%
- 5Y*
- 39.75%
- 10Y*
- 33.71%
WFC
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- -12.21%
- 6M
- -9.15%
- 1Y
- 8.39%
- 3Y*
- 27.47%
- 5Y*
- 14.74%
- 10Y*
- 8.26%
LLY vs. WFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 7.29% | 40.25% | 33.30% | 60.91% | 34.26% | 66.08% | 31.04% | 16.14% | 40.45% | 17.83% |
WFC Wells Fargo & Company | -12.21% | 35.57% | 46.48% | 22.94% | -11.92% | 61.15% | -41.65% | 21.44% | -21.83% | 13.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between LLY and WFC is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 1978 | 0.26 |
The correlation between LLY and WFC shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LLY:
$1.03T
WFC:
$260.48B
LLY:
$28.14
WFC:
$6.73
LLY:
40.83
WFC:
12.03
LLY:
0.82
WFC:
1.04
LLY:
14.28
WFC:
2.08
LLY:
33.00
WFC:
1.60
LLY:
$72.25B
WFC:
$125.70B
LLY:
$59.75B
WFC:
$81.14B
LLY:
$32.97B
WFC:
$31.58B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LLY vs. WFC — Risk / Return Rank
LLY
WFC
LLY vs. WFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LLY | WFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.08 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 0.37 | +1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.32 | 0.84 | +4.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LLY | WFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 0.32 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | 0.49 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.12 | 0.26 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.33 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
LLY vs. WFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LLY drawdown since its inception was -68.24%, smaller than the maximum WFC drawdown of -79.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLY and WFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LLY | WFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.24% | -79.01% | +10.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.64% | -23.02% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.48% | -24.73% | -9.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.48% | -37.10% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.48% | -64.46% | +29.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -15.11% | +15.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.22% | -15.35% | -3.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.49% | 10.06% | -0.57% |
Volatility
LLY vs. WFC - Volatility Comparison
Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) has a higher volatility of 9.55% compared to Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) at 8.57%. This indicates that LLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LLY | WFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.55% | 8.57% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.05% | 19.98% | +7.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.16% | 26.77% | +11.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.54% | 30.25% | +2.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.18% | 32.30% | -2.12% |
Dividends
LLY vs. WFC - Dividend Comparison
LLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than WFC's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 0.56% | 0.56% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.75% | 1.96% | 1.94% | 2.46% | 2.77% | 2.37% |
WFC Wells Fargo & Company | 2.22% | 1.82% | 2.14% | 2.64% | 2.66% | 1.25% | 4.04% | 3.57% | 3.56% | 2.54% | 2.75% | 2.71% |
Financials
LLY vs. WFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eli Lilly and Company and Wells Fargo & Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LLY vs. WFC - Profitability Comparison
LLY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a gross profit of 15.64B and revenue of 19.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.
WFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a gross profit of 20.31B and revenue of 31.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.9%.
LLY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported an operating income of 9.19B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.4%.
WFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported an operating income of 5.85B and revenue of 31.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.
LLY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a net income of 7.40B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.
WFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a net income of 5.29B and revenue of 31.80B, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LLY and WFC have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LLY has higher volatility (9.55%) compared to WFC (8.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LLY dropped -68.24% vs WFC's -79.01%.
LLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LLY and WFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer