PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LLY vs. IWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LLY vs. IWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLY achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly lower than IWR's 10.71% return. Over the past 10 years, LLY has outperformed IWR with an annualized return of 33.71%, while IWR has yielded a comparatively lower 11.41% annualized return.


LLY

1D
1.57%
1M
21.37%
YTD
7.29%
6M
15.58%
1Y
50.32%
3Y*
38.07%
5Y*
39.75%
10Y*
33.71%

IWR

1D
0.08%
1M
1.05%
YTD
10.71%
6M
10.50%
1Y
19.23%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LLY vs. IWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
7.29%40.25%33.30%60.91%34.26%66.08%31.04%16.14%40.45%17.83%
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
10.71%10.37%15.21%17.05%-17.48%22.44%16.93%30.23%-9.10%18.25%

Correlation

The correlation between LLY and IWR is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2001

0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between LLY and IWR has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LLY vs. IWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLY
LLY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLY Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
LLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

IWR
IWR Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
IWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWR Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWR Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLY vs. IWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LLYIWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.25

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

2.37

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.32

9.09

-3.77

LLY vs. IWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LLY Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the IWR Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LLY and IWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LLYIWRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.43

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.23

0.42

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.12

0.59

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.49

+0.09

Drawdowns

LLY vs. IWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLY drawdown since its inception was -68.24%, which is greater than IWR's maximum drawdown of -58.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLY and IWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LLYIWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.24%

-58.78%

-9.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.64%

-8.17%

-15.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.48%

-21.09%

-13.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.48%

-26.18%

-8.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.48%

-40.59%

+6.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.04%

+2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.22%

-7.80%

-11.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.49%

2.12%

+7.37%

Volatility

LLY vs. IWR - Volatility Comparison

Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) has a higher volatility of 9.55% compared to iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) at 3.59%. This indicates that LLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LLYIWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.55%

3.59%

+5.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.05%

10.06%

+16.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.16%

13.54%

+24.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.54%

18.25%

+14.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.18%

19.38%

+10.80%

Dividends

LLY vs. IWR - Dividend Comparison

LLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than IWR's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
1.17%1.29%1.27%1.43%1.59%1.04%1.28%1.43%1.98%1.52%1.72%1.59%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.56%0.56%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.94%2.46%2.77%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


LLY and IWR have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LLY has higher volatility (9.55%) compared to IWR (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LLY dropped -68.24% vs IWR's -58.78%.

IWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LLY and IWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer