PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LLOY.L vs. UL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LLOY.L vs. UL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lloyds Banking Group plc (LLOY.L) and The Unilever Group (UL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LLOY.L is traded in GBp, while UL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UL values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LLOY.L achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly higher than UL's -11.90% return. Over the past 10 years, LLOY.L has outperformed UL with an annualized return of 8.20%, while UL has yielded a comparatively lower 5.13% annualized return.


LLOY.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.03%
YTD
3.29%
6M
6.03%
1Y
34.00%
3Y*
36.39%
5Y*
21.21%
10Y*
8.20%

UL

1D
-1.14%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
-11.90%
6M
-8.53%
1Y
-17.08%
3Y*
1.43%
5Y*
0.94%
10Y*
5.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LLOY.L vs. UL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LLOY.L
Lloyds Banking Group plc
3.29%88.33%21.09%10.91%-0.38%34.81%-41.70%27.49%-20.02%11.38%
UL
The Unilever Group
-11.90%-1.59%23.01%-5.16%8.74%-6.73%5.83%8.58%3.46%28.03%

Correlation

The correlation between LLOY.L and UL is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2007

0.13

The correlation between LLOY.L and UL shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LLOY.L:

£58.25B

UL:

$123.13B

EPS

LLOY.L:

£0.08

UL:

$5.06

PE Ratio

LLOY.L:

11.79

UL:

11.08

PEG Ratio

LLOY.L:

3.30

UL:

2.17

PS Ratio

LLOY.L:

3.05

UL:

1.20

PB Ratio

LLOY.L:

1.21

UL:

7.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

LLOY.L:

£19.51B

UL:

$109.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LLOY.L:

£19.34B

UL:

$90.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

LLOY.L:

£7.17B

UL:

$24.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LLOY.L vs. UL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LLOY.L
LLOY.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
LLOY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLOY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLOY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
LLOY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLOY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

UL
UL Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
UL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
UL Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
UL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
UL Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LLOY.L vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lloyds Banking Group plc (LLOY.L) and The Unilever Group (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LLOY.LULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.87

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

-0.70

+2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.84

-1.47

+6.31

LLOY.L vs. UL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LLOY.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the UL Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LLOY.L and UL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LLOY.LULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

-0.82

+2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.05

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.24

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.39

-0.36

Drawdowns

LLOY.L vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LLOY.L drawdown since its inception was -91.44%, which is greater than UL's maximum drawdown of -34.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LLOY.L and UL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LLOY.LULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.44%

-34.44%

-57.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.68%

-24.55%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.68%

-24.55%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.65%

-24.55%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.34%

-31.72%

-32.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.88%

-22.67%

+12.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.56%

-9.11%

-43.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.00%

11.68%

-4.68%

Volatility

LLOY.L vs. UL - Volatility Comparison

Lloyds Banking Group plc (LLOY.L) has a higher volatility of 8.28% compared to The Unilever Group (UL) at 6.01%. This indicates that LLOY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LLOY.LULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.28%

6.01%

+2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.96%

17.98%

+2.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.61%

20.86%

+6.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.16%

19.94%

+7.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.69%

21.51%

+9.18%

Dividends

LLOY.L vs. UL - Dividend Comparison

LLOY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than UL's 4.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LLOY.L
Lloyds Banking Group plc
3.68%3.39%5.29%5.28%4.69%2.59%0.00%5.22%6.02%2.20%2.16%2.05%
UL
The Unilever Group
4.07%3.51%3.29%3.83%3.57%3.77%3.07%3.18%3.49%2.80%3.42%3.02%

Financials

LLOY.L vs. UL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lloyds Banking Group plc and The Unilever Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-10.00B0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B20222023202420252026
5.18B
18.38B
(LLOY.L) Total Revenue
(UL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. LLOY.L values in GBp, UL values in USD

LLOY.L vs. UL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lloyds Banking Group plc and The Unilever Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
0
Portfolio components
LLOY.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a gross profit of 5.18B and revenue of 5.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

UL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 18.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LLOY.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported an operating income of 2.03B and revenue of 5.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.1%.

UL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported an operating income of 4.13B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.

LLOY.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a net income of 1.53B and revenue of 5.18B, resulting in a net margin of 29.5%.

UL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a net income of 2.56B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LLOY.L and UL have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LLOY.L and UL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer