PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LI vs. TCOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LI vs. TCOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Li Auto Inc. (LI) and Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LI achieves a -14.18% return, which is significantly higher than TCOM's -34.35% return.


LI

1D
2.32%
1M
-19.28%
YTD
-14.18%
6M
-19.05%
1Y
-50.78%
3Y*
-22.96%
5Y*
-11.93%
10Y*

TCOM

1D
-1.01%
1M
-10.38%
YTD
-34.35%
6M
-32.70%
1Y
-22.11%
3Y*
7.88%
5Y*
4.71%
10Y*
1.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LI vs. TCOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LI
Li Auto Inc.
-14.18%-29.43%-35.91%83.48%-36.45%11.34%75.15%
TCOM
Trip.com Group Limited
-34.35%5.24%90.67%4.68%39.72%-27.01%22.83%

Correlation

The correlation between LI and TCOM is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020

0.37

The correlation between LI and TCOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LI:

$14.73B

TCOM:

$33.07B

EPS

LI:

-$1.74

TCOM:

$47.68

PS Ratio

LI:

0.14

TCOM:

0.53

PB Ratio

LI:

0.21

TCOM:

0.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

LI:

$108.98B

TCOM:

$62.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LI:

$17.42B

TCOM:

$50.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

LI:

-$2.83B

TCOM:

$34.17B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LI vs. TCOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LI
LI Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
LI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LI Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
LI Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
LI Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
LI Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

TCOM
TCOM Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TCOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCOM Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TCOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCOM Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LI vs. TCOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Li Auto Inc. (LI) and Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LITCOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

0.90

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

-0.54

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.38

-1.04

-0.34

LI vs. TCOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LI Sharpe Ratio is -1.27, which is lower than the TCOM Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LI and TCOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LITCOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.27

-0.61

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

0.10

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.30

-0.33

Drawdowns

LI vs. TCOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LI drawdown since its inception was -69.56%, smaller than the maximum TCOM drawdown of -76.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LI and TCOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LITCOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.56%

-76.34%

+6.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.35%

-41.27%

-14.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.56%

-41.27%

-28.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.56%

-55.36%

-14.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.85%

-40.21%

-28.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.88%

-27.83%

-12.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.80%

21.25%

+15.55%

Volatility

LI vs. TCOM - Volatility Comparison

Li Auto Inc. (LI) has a higher volatility of 17.56% compared to Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) at 6.70%. This indicates that LI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LITCOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.56%

6.70%

+10.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.48%

27.46%

+1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.22%

36.34%

+3.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.55%

49.09%

+14.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.35%

44.30%

+24.05%

Dividends

LI vs. TCOM - Dividend Comparison

Neither LI nor TCOM has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
LI
Li Auto Inc.
0.00%0.00%
TCOM
Trip.com Group Limited
0.00%0.42%

Financials

LI vs. TCOM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Li Auto Inc. and Trip.com Group Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
22.84B
15.19B
(LI) Total Revenue
(TCOM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LI vs. TCOM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Li Auto Inc. and Trip.com Group Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
7.9%
79.0%
Portfolio components
LI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.80B and revenue of 22.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.9%.

TCOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported a gross profit of 11.99B and revenue of 15.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.

LI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported an operating income of -2.95B and revenue of 22.84B, resulting in an operating margin of -12.9%.

TCOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported an operating income of 2.50B and revenue of 15.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.

LI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a net income of -2.28B and revenue of 22.84B, resulting in a net margin of -10.0%.

TCOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported a net income of 4.22B and revenue of 15.19B, resulting in a net margin of 27.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LI and TCOM have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LI has higher volatility (17.56%) compared to TCOM (6.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LI dropped -69.56% vs TCOM's -76.34%.

TCOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.61 vs -1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LI and TCOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer