PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFGY vs. GLDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LFGY vs. GLDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFGY achieves a 14.39% return, which is significantly higher than GLDY's -4.78% return.


LFGY

1D
4.44%
1M
-3.09%
YTD
14.39%
6M
4.19%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLDY

1D
0.29%
1M
-6.85%
YTD
-4.78%
6M
-2.80%
1Y
11.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFGY vs. GLDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LFGY and GLDY is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFGY vs. GLDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFGY
LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDY
GLDY Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GLDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDY Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDY Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFGY vs. GLDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LFGYGLDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.13

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

0.74

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.30

1.98

-1.68

LFGY vs. GLDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFGY Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the GLDY Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFGY and GLDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LFGYGLDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

0.57

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.42

-0.34

Drawdowns

LFGY vs. GLDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFGY drawdown since its inception was -35.94%, which is greater than GLDY's maximum drawdown of -15.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFGY and GLDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFGYGLDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.94%

-15.57%

-20.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.94%

-15.57%

-20.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.62%

-15.33%

+2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.06%

-4.02%

-10.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.48%

5.83%

+10.65%

Volatility

LFGY vs. GLDY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) has a higher volatility of 12.43% compared to Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) at 4.95%. This indicates that LFGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFGYGLDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.43%

4.95%

+7.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.17%

18.57%

+12.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.80%

20.14%

+17.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.36%

19.71%

+22.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.36%

19.71%

+22.65%

LFGY vs. GLDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LFGY and GLDY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

LFGY vs. GLDY - Dividend Comparison

LFGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 82.87%, more than GLDY's 48.51% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


LFGY and GLDY have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LFGY has higher volatility (12.43%) compared to GLDY (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFGY dropped -35.94% vs GLDY's -15.57%.

On 1-year performance, GLDY leads with 11.50% vs 4.87% for LFGY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, GLDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GLDY has performed better with a 11.50% return vs 4.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LFGY and GLDY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

LFGY has the higher dividend yield at 82.87%, compared with 48.51% for GLDY.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Defiance.

GLDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFGY and GLDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer