LEU vs. ANGL

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

LEU (Centrus Energy Corp.) is a stock, while ANGL (VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF) is High Yield Bonds fund tracking the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index. Over the past 10 years, LEU returned 46.90%/yr vs 6.13%/yr for ANGL. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LEU vs. ANGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEU achieves a -32.55% return, which is significantly lower than ANGL's 1.27% return. Over the past 10 years, LEU has outperformed ANGL with an annualized return of 46.90%, while ANGL has yielded a comparatively lower 6.13% annualized return.

LEU

• 1D: 1.21%
• 1M: -21.02%
• YTD: -32.55%
• 6M: -39.02%
• 1Y: 14.42%
• 3Y*: 71.98%
• 5Y*: 44.90%
• 10Y*: 46.90%

ANGL

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -0.23%
• YTD: 1.27%
• 6M: 1.74%
• 1Y: 7.79%
• 3Y*: 8.23%
• 5Y*: 3.26%
• 10Y*: 6.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEU vs. ANGL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LEU Centrus Energy Corp.	-32.55%	264.45%	22.42%	67.52%	-34.92%	115.78%	236.19%	307.10%	-57.86%	-37.15%
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF	1.27%	9.04%	6.06%	12.52%	-14.26%	6.84%	13.20%	18.06%	-5.84%	9.71%

Correlation

The correlation between LEU and ANGL is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2012	0.16

The correlation between LEU and ANGL shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LEU vs. ANGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEU

LEU Risk / Return Rank: 49
LEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
LEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
LEU Omega Ratio Rank: 51
LEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
LEU Martin Ratio Rank: 47

ANGL

ANGL Risk / Return Rank: 56
ANGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
ANGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
ANGL Omega Ratio Rank: 65
ANGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
ANGL Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEU vs. ANGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LEU	ANGL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	1.81	-1.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.87	2.58	-1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.35	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.23	1.93	-1.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.38	8.09	-7.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LEU vs. ANGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEU Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the ANGL Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEU and ANGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LEU	ANGL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	1.81	-1.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.43	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.66	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	0.73	-0.83

Drawdowns

LEU vs. ANGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEU drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than ANGL's maximum drawdown of -29.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEU and ANGL.

Drawdown Indicators

	LEU	ANGL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.98%	-29.31%	-70.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.89%	-4.05%	-58.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-62.89%	-5.48%	-57.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.23%	-19.25%	-58.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.84%	-29.31%	-54.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.58%	-0.58%	-97.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-73.98%	-3.30%	-70.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.75%	0.96%	+36.79%

Volatility

LEU vs. ANGL - Volatility Comparison

Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) has a higher volatility of 22.37% compared to VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) at 1.35%. This indicates that LEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LEU	ANGL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.37%	1.35%	+21.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	65.68%	3.50%	+62.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	91.10%	4.34%	+86.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	86.24%	7.63%	+78.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	82.26%	9.28%	+72.98%

Dividends

LEU vs. ANGL - Dividend Comparison

LEU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ANGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF	6.39%	6.20%	6.29%	5.27%	4.72%	3.90%	4.67%	5.19%	5.99%	5.25%	5.34%	5.81%
LEU Centrus Energy Corp.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LEU and ANGL in my portfolio?

LEU and ANGL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LEU or ANGL?

LEU has higher volatility (22.37%) compared to ANGL (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEU dropped -99.98% vs ANGL's -29.31%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ANGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.