LDOS vs. FFH.TO
LDOS (Leidos Holdings, Inc.) and FFH.TO (Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited) are both stocks. LDOS operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while FFH.TO operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, LDOS returned 15.01%/yr vs 14.02%/yr for FFH.TO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LDOS vs. FFH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LDOS is traded in USD, while FFH.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the FFH.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDOS achieves a -31.76% return, which is significantly lower than FFH.TO's -14.73% return. Over the past 10 years, LDOS has outperformed FFH.TO with an annualized return of 15.01%, while FFH.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 14.02% annualized return.
LDOS
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -5.62%
- YTD
- -31.76%
- 6M
- -33.53%
- 1Y
- -16.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.32%
- 5Y*
- 4.53%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
FFH.TO
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- -14.73%
- 6M
- -7.32%
- 1Y
- -2.45%
- 3Y*
- 31.71%
- 5Y*
- 30.16%
- 10Y*
- 14.02%
LDOS vs. FFH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc. | -31.76% | 26.50% | 34.52% | 4.50% | 20.04% | -14.20% | 8.95% | 88.82% | -16.72% | 29.14% |
FFH.TO Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited | -14.73% | 38.55% | 53.28% | 58.73% | 23.67% | 47.33% | -25.54% | 8.10% | -15.60% | 13.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDOS and FFH.TO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2006 | 0.12 |
The correlation between LDOS and FFH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LDOS:
$15.72B
FFH.TO:
CA$50.38B
LDOS:
$10.92
FFH.TO:
CA$205.21
LDOS:
11.25
FFH.TO:
10.98
LDOS:
0.09
FFH.TO:
0.18
LDOS:
0.92
FFH.TO:
1.69
LDOS:
3.14
FFH.TO:
1.95
LDOS:
$17.33B
FFH.TO:
CA$29.34B
LDOS:
$3.04B
FFH.TO:
CA$6.18B
LDOS:
$2.34B
FFH.TO:
CA$7.83B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDOS vs. FFH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
LDOS
FFH.TO
LDOS vs. FFH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) and Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (FFH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LDOS | FFH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.00 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | -0.13 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | -0.28 | -0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LDOS | FFH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | -0.11 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 1.23 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.53 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.61 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
LDOS vs. FFH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDOS drawdown since its inception was -54.72%, smaller than the maximum FFH.TO drawdown of -59.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDOS and FFH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDOS | FFH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.72% | -59.23% | +4.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.17% | -19.52% | -18.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.17% | -19.52% | -18.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.17% | -20.30% | -17.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.29% | -59.23% | +16.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.17% | -15.06% | -23.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.67% | -11.25% | -8.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.55% | 8.77% | +5.78% |
Volatility
LDOS vs. FFH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) has a higher volatility of 7.17% compared to Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (FFH.TO) at 6.09%. This indicates that LDOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDOS | FFH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.17% | 6.09% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.18% | 18.55% | +6.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.33% | 22.86% | +6.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.74% | 24.69% | +2.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.50% | 26.47% | +1.03% |
Dividends
LDOS vs. FFH.TO - Dividend Comparison
LDOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than FFH.TO's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFH.TO Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited | 0.92% | 0.83% | 1.01% | 1.10% | 1.56% | 2.03% | 3.01% | 2.18% | 2.07% | 1.95% | 2.24% | 1.82% |
LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc. | 1.35% | 0.90% | 1.07% | 1.35% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.29% | 1.35% | 2.43% | 1.98% | 29.17% | 3.41% |
Financials
LDOS vs. FFH.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leidos Holdings, Inc. and Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LDOS vs. FFH.TO - Profitability Comparison
LDOS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 761.00M and revenue of 4.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.3%.
FFH.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 986.70M and revenue of 6.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.4%.
LDOS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 508.00M and revenue of 4.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.
FFH.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 1.04B and revenue of 6.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.
LDOS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 328.00M and revenue of 4.40B, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.
FFH.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited reported a net income of 695.70M and revenue of 6.41B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LDOS and FFH.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LDOS and FFH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer