PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDEG.L vs. GEDM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDEG.L vs. GEDM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) and iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (GEDM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LDEG.L is traded in GBp, while GEDM.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GEDM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDEG.L achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly lower than GEDM.L's 20.80% return.


LDEG.L

1D
0.86%
1M
1.00%
YTD
10.35%
6M
14.02%
1Y
29.69%
3Y*
24.21%
5Y*
15.94%
10Y*

GEDM.L

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
20.80%
6M
21.84%
1Y
44.52%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDEG.L vs. GEDM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
10.35%44.91%8.81%14.31%1.91%-8.28%
GEDM.L
iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
20.80%24.11%8.80%4.58%-11.07%-3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between LDEG.L and GEDM.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2021

0.51

The correlation between LDEG.L and GEDM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

LDEG.L vs. GEDM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LDEG.L
GEDM.L

Financial Services

41.5%
17.7%

Industrials

15.8%
7.6%

Basic Materials

9.9%
5.5%

Utilities

8.2%
1.2%

Energy

7.7%
2.9%

Communication Services

5.2%
6.0%

Healthcare

3.4%
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

3.3%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
2.7%

Technology

2.0%
42.5%

Real Estate

-

1.6%

Financial Services

LDEG.L
41.5%
GEDM.L
17.7%

Industrials

LDEG.L
15.8%
GEDM.L
7.6%

Basic Materials

LDEG.L
9.9%
GEDM.L
5.5%

Utilities

LDEG.L
8.2%
GEDM.L
1.2%

Energy

LDEG.L
7.7%
GEDM.L
2.9%

Communication Services

LDEG.L
5.2%
GEDM.L
6.0%

Healthcare

LDEG.L
3.4%
GEDM.L
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

LDEG.L
3.3%
GEDM.L
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

LDEG.L
3.1%
GEDM.L
2.7%

Technology

LDEG.L
2.0%
GEDM.L
42.5%

Real Estate

LDEG.L

-

GEDM.L
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDEG.L vs. GEDM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDEG.L
LDEG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

GEDM.L
GEDM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
GEDM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEDM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEDM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
GEDM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEDM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDEG.L vs. GEDM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) and iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (GEDM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LDEG.LGEDM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.48

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

3.84

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.42

13.70

-0.28

LDEG.L vs. GEDM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the GEDM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDEG.L and GEDM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LDEG.LGEDM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.57

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

0.49

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.32

+0.52

Drawdowns

LDEG.L vs. GEDM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDEG.L drawdown since its inception was -21.96%, smaller than the maximum GEDM.L drawdown of -38.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDEG.L and GEDM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDEG.LGEDM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.96%

-38.64%

+16.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-11.53%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.05%

-15.29%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.39%

-23.30%

+5.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-5.65%

+4.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.40%

-11.35%

+5.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

3.24%

-1.03%

Volatility

LDEG.L vs. GEDM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) is 3.28%, while iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (GEDM.L) has a volatility of 7.98%. This indicates that LDEG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEDM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDEG.LGEDM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

7.98%

-4.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.23%

14.98%

-5.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.63%

17.27%

-5.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.20%

16.01%

-1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.23%

18.96%

-3.73%

LDEG.L vs. GEDM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDEG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GEDM.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LDEG.L vs. GEDM.L - Dividend Comparison

LDEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than GEDM.L's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
GEDM.L
iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.62%1.95%2.34%2.32%2.52%1.82%1.58%2.28%
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
3.12%3.42%4.20%4.10%3.69%3.06%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDEG.L and GEDM.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GEDM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GEDM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LDEG.L.

LDEG.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while GEDM.L is Emerging Markets Equities. LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while GEDM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LDEG.L and 0.18% for GEDM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDEG.L and GEDM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer