PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAES vs. NEE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LAES vs. NEE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEALSQ Corp (LAES) and NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAES achieves a -14.81% return, which is significantly lower than NEE's 6.13% return.


LAES

1D
0.63%
1M
10.27%
YTD
-14.81%
6M
-34.42%
1Y
-6.94%
3Y*
-31.28%
5Y*
10Y*

NEE

1D
-2.13%
1M
-9.10%
YTD
6.13%
6M
5.78%
1Y
19.79%
3Y*
7.41%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
13.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAES vs. NEE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LAES
SEALSQ Corp
-14.81%-38.54%380.47%-92.82%
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
6.13%15.47%21.46%-16.33%

Correlation

The correlation between LAES and NEE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2023

0.06

Fundamentals

EPS

LAES:

-$0.43

NEE:

$5.27

PS Ratio

LAES:

10.60

NEE:

4.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

LAES:

$35.37M

NEE:

$27.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LAES:

$13.21M

NEE:

$13.35B

EBITDA (TTM)

LAES:

-$41.81M

NEE:

$14.56B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAES vs. NEE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAES
LAES Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LAES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAES Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAES Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
LAES Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAES Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

NEE
NEE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
NEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
NEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAES vs. NEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEALSQ Corp (LAES) and NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LAESNEEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.17

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

1.37

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.16

3.95

-4.12

LAES vs. NEE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAES Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the NEE Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAES and NEE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LAESNEEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

0.84

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.28

0.61

-0.89

Drawdowns

LAES vs. NEE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAES drawdown since its inception was -98.44%, which is greater than NEE's maximum drawdown of -47.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAES and NEE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAESNEEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.44%

-47.81%

-50.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.68%

-14.53%

-58.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.07%

-34.57%

-63.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.34%

-13.54%

-71.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.70%

-8.92%

-75.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.96%

5.02%

+37.94%

Volatility

LAES vs. NEE - Volatility Comparison

SEALSQ Corp (LAES) has a higher volatility of 28.36% compared to NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) at 8.52%. This indicates that LAES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAESNEEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.36%

8.52%

+19.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

66.00%

17.13%

+48.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

110.53%

23.81%

+86.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

170.27%

26.92%

+143.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

170.27%

25.49%

+144.78%

Dividends

LAES vs. NEE - Dividend Comparison

LAES has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LAES
SEALSQ Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
2.83%2.82%2.87%3.08%2.03%1.65%1.81%2.06%2.55%2.52%2.91%2.96%

Financials

LAES vs. NEE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SEALSQ Corp and NextEra Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
5.60M
6.70B
(LAES) Total Revenue
(NEE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LAES and NEE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAES has higher volatility (28.36%) compared to NEE (8.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAES dropped -98.44% vs NEE's -47.81%.

NEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAES and NEE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer