LAES vs. NBIS
LAES (SEALSQ Corp) and NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) are both stocks. LAES operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while NBIS operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past year, LAES returned -6.94% vs 351.53% for NBIS. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LAES vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAES achieves a -14.81% return, which is significantly lower than NBIS's 160.44% return.
LAES
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 10.27%
- YTD
- -14.81%
- 6M
- -34.42%
- 1Y
- -6.94%
- 3Y*
- -31.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBIS
- 1D
- -4.31%
- 1M
- 23.13%
- YTD
- 160.44%
- 6M
- 117.28%
- 1Y
- 351.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LAES vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LAES SEALSQ Corp | -14.81% | -38.54% | 1,288.89% |
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 160.44% | 202.18% | 46.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAES and NBIS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024 | 0.37 |
Fundamentals
LAES:
-$0.43
NBIS:
$3.17
LAES:
10.60
NBIS:
65.42
LAES:
$35.37M
NBIS:
$877.90M
LAES:
$13.21M
NBIS:
$420.60M
LAES:
-$41.81M
NBIS:
-$52.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAES vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank
LAES
NBIS
LAES vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEALSQ Corp (LAES) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LAES | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.41 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 7.79 | -7.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.16 | 17.86 | -18.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LAES | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 | 3.39 | -3.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.28 | 3.19 | -3.46 |
Drawdowns
LAES vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAES drawdown since its inception was -98.44%, which is greater than NBIS's maximum drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAES and NBIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAES | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.44% | -58.27% | -40.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.68% | -45.47% | -27.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.34% | -17.58% | -67.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.70% | -19.02% | -65.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.96% | 19.79% | +23.17% |
Volatility
LAES vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SEALSQ Corp (LAES) is 28.36%, while Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a volatility of 33.60%. This indicates that LAES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAES | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.36% | 33.60% | -5.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.00% | 71.53% | -5.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 110.53% | 104.78% | +5.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 170.27% | 110.72% | +59.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 170.27% | 110.72% | +59.55% |
Dividends
LAES vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison
Neither LAES nor NBIS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LAES vs. NBIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SEALSQ Corp and Nebius Group N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LAES and NBIS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NBIS has higher volatility (33.60%) compared to LAES (28.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAES dropped -98.44% vs NBIS's -58.27%.
NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LAES and NBIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer