LAC vs. RR

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

LAC (Lithium Americas Corp.) and RR (Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock) are both stocks. LAC operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while RR operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past year, LAC returned 68.89% vs 3.18% for RR. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LAC vs. RR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock (RR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAC achieves a 4.59% return, which is significantly higher than RR's -24.61% return.

LAC

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -18.13%
• YTD: 4.59%
• 6M: -14.12%
• 1Y: 68.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RR

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: -7.77%
• YTD: -24.61%
• 6M: -44.41%
• 1Y: 3.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAC vs. RR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.	4.59%	46.80%	-53.59%	-7.91%
RR Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock	-24.61%	19.63%	-54.62%	19.00%

Correlation

The correlation between LAC and RR is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2023	0.35

Over the past year, LAC and RR have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap LAC : $1.61B RR : $473.83M
EPS LAC : -$0.28 RR : -$0.11
PB Ratio LAC : 1.19 RR : 1.76
Total Revenue (TTM) LAC : $0.00 RR : $5.05M
Gross Profit (TTM) LAC : -$580.22K RR : $3.29M
EBITDA (TTM) LAC : -$52.10M RR : -$12.64M

Return for Risk

LAC vs. RR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAC

LAC Risk / Return Rank: 68
LAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
LAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
LAC Omega Ratio Rank: 74
LAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
LAC Martin Ratio Rank: 59

RR

RR Risk / Return Rank: 47
RR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
RR Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
RR Omega Ratio Rank: 52
RR Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
RR Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAC vs. RR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock (RR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LAC	RR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.53	0.03	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	1.04	+1.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.11	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	0.04	+1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.69	0.07	+1.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LAC vs. RR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is higher than the RR Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAC and RR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LAC	RR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53	0.03	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.26	-0.16	-0.10

Drawdowns

LAC vs. RR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAC drawdown since its inception was -81.83%, smaller than the maximum RR drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAC and RR.

Drawdown Indicators

	LAC	RR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.83%	-96.67%	+14.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-63.08%	-73.37%	+10.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.09%	-78.06%	+16.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.22%	-74.83%	+11.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.87%	45.57%	-4.70%

Volatility

LAC vs. RR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) is 21.31%, while Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock (RR) has a volatility of 31.92%. This indicates that LAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LAC	RR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.31%	31.92%	-10.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.78%	80.35%	-27.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	132.10%	119.34%	+12.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	101.33%	164.25%	-62.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	101.33%	164.25%	-62.92%

Dividends

LAC vs. RR - Dividend Comparison

Neither LAC nor RR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LAC and RR in my portfolio?

LAC and RR have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LAC or RR?

RR has higher volatility (31.92%) compared to LAC (21.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAC dropped -81.83% vs RR's -96.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.