LAC vs. FSM

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

LAC (Lithium Americas Corp.) and FSM (Fortuna Silver Mines Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — LAC in Other Industrial Metals & Mining, FSM in Silver. Over the past year, LAC returned 68.89% vs 23.00% for FSM. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LAC vs. FSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAC achieves a 4.59% return, which is significantly higher than FSM's -10.60% return.

LAC

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -18.13%
• YTD: 4.59%
• 6M: -14.12%
• 1Y: 68.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FSM

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: -18.49%
• YTD: -10.60%
• 6M: -4.88%
• 1Y: 23.00%
• 3Y*: 35.95%
• 5Y*: 5.60%
• 10Y*: 3.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAC vs. FSM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.	4.59%	46.80%	-53.59%	-27.19%
FSM Fortuna Silver Mines Inc.	-10.60%	128.67%	11.14%	41.91%

Correlation

The correlation between LAC and FSM is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023	0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap LAC : $1.61B FSM : $2.92B
EPS LAC : -$0.28 FSM : $1.06
PB Ratio LAC : 1.19 FSM : 1.65
Total Revenue (TTM) LAC : $0.00 FSM : $1.10B
Gross Profit (TTM) LAC : -$580.22K FSM : $598.05M
EBITDA (TTM) LAC : -$52.10M FSM : $743.42M

Return for Risk

LAC vs. FSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAC

LAC Risk / Return Rank: 68
LAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
LAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
LAC Omega Ratio Rank: 74
LAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
LAC Martin Ratio Rank: 59

FSM

FSM Risk / Return Rank: 55
FSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FSM Omega Ratio Rank: 53
FSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FSM Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAC vs. FSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LAC	FSM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.53	0.41	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	0.91	+1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.12	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	0.62	+0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.69	1.51	+0.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LAC vs. FSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is comparable to the FSM Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAC and FSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LAC	FSM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53	0.41	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.26	0.13	-0.38

Drawdowns

LAC vs. FSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAC drawdown since its inception was -81.83%, smaller than the maximum FSM drawdown of -92.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAC and FSM.

Drawdown Indicators

	LAC	FSM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.83%	-92.25%	+10.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-63.08%	-37.26%	-25.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-37.26%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-69.35%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-81.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.09%	-35.80%	-25.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.22%	-45.17%	-18.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.87%	15.37%	+25.50%

Volatility

LAC vs. FSM - Volatility Comparison

Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) has a higher volatility of 21.31% compared to Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) at 15.57%. This indicates that LAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LAC	FSM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.31%	15.57%	+5.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.78%	44.86%	+7.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	132.10%	57.05%	+75.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	101.33%	57.36%	+43.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	101.33%	59.44%	+41.89%

Dividends

LAC vs. FSM - Dividend Comparison

Neither LAC nor FSM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LAC and FSM in my portfolio?

LAC and FSM have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LAC or FSM?

LAC has higher volatility (21.31%) compared to FSM (15.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAC dropped -81.83% vs FSM's -92.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.