L100.L vs. MLPD.L

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

L100.L (Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc) and MLPD.L (Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - L100.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while MLPD.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, L100.L returned 9.29%/yr vs 7.82%/yr for MLPD.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. L100.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MLPD.L.

Performance

L100.L vs. MLPD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

L100.L is traded in GBp, while MLPD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MLPD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, L100.L achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly lower than MLPD.L's 19.98% return. Over the past 10 years, L100.L has outperformed MLPD.L with an annualized return of 9.29%, while MLPD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.82% annualized return.

L100.L

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 1.68%
• YTD: 6.18%
• 6M: 9.31%
• 1Y: 21.05%
• 3Y*: 15.00%
• 5Y*: 11.77%
• 10Y*: 9.29%

MLPD.L

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 3.55%
• YTD: 19.98%
• 6M: 14.43%
• 1Y: 17.20%
• 3Y*: 16.51%
• 5Y*: 17.77%
• 10Y*: 7.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

L100.L vs. MLPD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
L100.L Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc	6.18%	25.82%	9.29%	7.37%	4.86%	17.92%	-11.79%	17.40%	-9.14%	12.09%
MLPD.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)	19.98%	-4.95%	24.67%	13.72%	47.50%	38.20%	-33.40%	3.14%	-9.87%	-16.56%

Correlation

The correlation between L100.L and MLPD.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2013	0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between L100.L and MLPD.L has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

L100.L vs. MLPD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	L100.L	MLPD.L
Financial Services	24.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	13.9%	-
Industrials	13.7%	0.2%
Healthcare	13.6%	-
Energy	11.7%	96.7%
Basic Materials	8.5%	-
Utilities	5.3%	3.2%
Consumer Cyclical	4.7%	-
Communication Services	2.6%	-
Real Estate	0.9%	-
Technology	0.8%	-

Return for Risk

L100.L vs. MLPD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

L100.L

L100.L Risk / Return Rank: 60
L100.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
L100.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
L100.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
L100.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
L100.L Martin Ratio Rank: 52

MLPD.L

MLPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 34
MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
MLPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
MLPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 31
MLPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
MLPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

L100.L vs. MLPD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	L100.L	MLPD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	1.07	+0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	1.52	+1.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.19	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	1.83	+0.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.97	4.31	+3.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

L100.L vs. MLPD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current L100.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of L100.L and MLPD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	L100.L	MLPD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.92	1.07	+0.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92	0.88	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	0.28	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.16	+0.18

Drawdowns

L100.L vs. MLPD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum L100.L drawdown since its inception was -43.92%, smaller than the maximum MLPD.L drawdown of -75.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L100.L and MLPD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	L100.L	MLPD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.92%	-75.45%	+31.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.00%	-9.38%	+0.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.01%	-19.01%	+6.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.01%	-19.01%	+6.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.64%	-73.90%	+39.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.81%	-2.75%	-1.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.19%	-20.15%	+12.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.63%	3.99%	-1.36%

Volatility

L100.L vs. MLPD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L) is 2.91%, while Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that L100.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	L100.L	MLPD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	5.18%	-2.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.53%	12.36%	-2.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.96%	16.01%	-5.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.82%	20.25%	-7.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.08%	28.15%	-13.07%

L100.L vs. MLPD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

L100.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

L100.L vs. MLPD.L - Dividend Comparison

L100.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MLPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
L100.L Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MLPD.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)	7.56%	8.21%	8.18%	8.60%	7.98%	8.57%	11.03%	10.06%	9.87%	8.15%	8.14%	9.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both L100.L and MLPD.L in my portfolio?

L100.L and MLPD.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, L100.L or MLPD.L?

On fees, L100.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, L100.L or MLPD.L?

L100.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MLPD.L.

What is the main difference between L100.L and MLPD.L?

L100.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while MLPD.L is Energy Equities. L100.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while MLPD.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for L100.L and 0.50% for MLPD.L.