PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KRT vs. AKO-A
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KRT vs. AKO-A - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) and Embotelladora Andina S.A (AKO-A). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRT achieves a 33.08% return, which is significantly higher than AKO-A's -10.20% return.


KRT

1D
2.04%
1M
5.13%
YTD
33.08%
6M
38.41%
1Y
0.04%
3Y*
29.10%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*

AKO-A

1D
-11.01%
1M
-7.42%
YTD
-10.20%
6M
-8.49%
1Y
4.96%
3Y*
25.94%
5Y*
21.94%
10Y*
8.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRT vs. AKO-A - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KRT
Karat Packaging Inc.
33.08%-20.12%28.81%86.11%-27.07%8.66%
AKO-A
Embotelladora Andina S.A
-10.20%69.94%22.39%32.28%25.25%-22.56%

Correlation

The correlation between KRT and AKO-A is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021

0.00

The correlation between KRT and AKO-A shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.00 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KRT:

$582.73M

AKO-A:

$3.06B

EPS

KRT:

$1.58

AKO-A:

$1.95K

PE Ratio

KRT:

18.39

AKO-A:

0.01

PEG Ratio

KRT:

1.89

AKO-A:

0.00

PS Ratio

KRT:

1.22

AKO-A:

0.00

PB Ratio

KRT:

3.76

AKO-A:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

KRT:

$481.07M

AKO-A:

$3.42T

Gross Profit (TTM)

KRT:

$172.90M

AKO-A:

$1.34T

EBITDA (TTM)

KRT:

$56.33M

AKO-A:

$620.88B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KRT vs. AKO-A — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRT
KRT Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
KRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRT Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
KRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRT Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

AKO-A
AKO-A Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
AKO-A Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AKO-A Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AKO-A Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AKO-A Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
AKO-A Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRT vs. AKO-A - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) and Embotelladora Andina S.A (AKO-A). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KRTAKO-ADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.08

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.00

0.22

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.00

0.55

-0.55

KRT vs. AKO-A - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRT Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the AKO-A Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRT and AKO-A, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KRTAKO-ADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

0.10

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.52

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.20

+0.13

Drawdowns

KRT vs. AKO-A - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRT drawdown since its inception was -48.46%, smaller than the maximum AKO-A drawdown of -79.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRT and AKO-A.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRTAKO-ADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.46%

-79.18%

+30.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.57%

-22.40%

-9.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.03%

-25.41%

-8.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.46%

-25.41%

-23.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.86%

-22.40%

+18.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.56%

-30.92%

+12.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.40%

9.07%

+8.33%

Volatility

KRT vs. AKO-A - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) is 13.45%, while Embotelladora Andina S.A (AKO-A) has a volatility of 16.27%. This indicates that KRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AKO-A based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRTAKO-ADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.45%

16.27%

-2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.23%

41.68%

-13.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.76%

52.00%

-12.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.40%

42.35%

+3.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.50%

41.97%

+3.53%

Dividends

KRT vs. AKO-A - Dividend Comparison

KRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.20%, more than AKO-A's 5.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AKO-A
Embotelladora Andina S.A
5.09%5.24%6.95%9.27%17.81%8.12%5.74%4.72%4.16%2.63%2.34%2.50%
KRT
Karat Packaging Inc.
6.20%7.98%5.12%6.24%2.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

KRT vs. AKO-A - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Karat Packaging Inc. and Embotelladora Andina S.A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B1.00T20222023202420252026
116.95M
958.49B
(KRT) Total Revenue
(AKO-A) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KRT vs. AKO-A - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Karat Packaging Inc. and Embotelladora Andina S.A over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

28.0%30.0%32.0%34.0%36.0%38.0%40.0%42.0%20222023202420252026
35.5%
41.0%
Portfolio components
KRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Karat Packaging Inc. reported a gross profit of 41.53M and revenue of 116.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.

AKO-A - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embotelladora Andina S.A reported a gross profit of 393.07B and revenue of 958.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.0%.

KRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Karat Packaging Inc. reported an operating income of 8.46M and revenue of 116.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.2%.

AKO-A - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embotelladora Andina S.A reported an operating income of 147.46B and revenue of 958.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.

KRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Karat Packaging Inc. reported a net income of 6.74M and revenue of 116.95M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.

AKO-A - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embotelladora Andina S.A reported a net income of 102.93B and revenue of 958.49B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KRT and AKO-A have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AKO-A has higher volatility (16.27%) compared to KRT (13.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRT dropped -48.46% vs AKO-A's -79.18%.

AKO-A currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KRT and AKO-A

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer