KO vs. VT
KO (The Coca-Cola Company) is a stock, while VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, KO returned 8.99%/yr vs 12.61%/yr for VT. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KO vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KO achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 9.77% return. Over the past 10 years, KO has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 8.99%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.61% annualized return.
KO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 14.56%
- 6M
- 14.00%
- 1Y
- 14.71%
- 3Y*
- 12.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.99%
VT
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- YTD
- 9.77%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 25.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
KO vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 14.56% | 15.60% | 8.88% | -4.43% | 10.61% | 11.37% | 2.47% | 20.60% | 6.77% | 14.38% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 9.77% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between KO and VT is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008 | 0.44 |
The correlation between KO and VT shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KO vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
KO
VT
KO vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Coca-Cola Company (KO) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KO | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.36 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 2.64 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.66 | 11.68 | -8.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KO | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 1.96 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.66 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.73 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.43 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
KO vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KO drawdown since its inception was -68.23%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KO and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KO | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.23% | -50.27% | -17.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | -9.67% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.26% | -16.51% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.27% | -26.38% | +9.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.99% | -34.24% | -2.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.91% | -3.06% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.09% | -7.02% | -9.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 2.19% | +1.84% |
Volatility
KO vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 4.55%. This indicates that KO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KO | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 4.55% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.37% | 10.67% | +1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.37% | 13.10% | +3.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.10% | 16.10% | 0.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 17.26% | +0.95% |
Dividends
KO vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
KO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than VT's 1.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 2.59% | 2.92% | 3.12% | 3.12% | 2.77% | 2.84% | 2.99% | 2.89% | 3.29% | 3.23% | 3.38% | 3.07% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KO and VT have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KO has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to VT (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KO dropped -68.23% vs VT's -50.27%.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KO and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer