KO vs. CMOD.L

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

KO (The Coca-Cola Company) is a stock, while CMOD.L (Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF) is Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity TR Index. Over the past 5 years, KO returned 10.72%/yr vs 10.42%/yr for CMOD.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KO vs. CMOD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Coca-Cola Company (KO) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (CMOD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KO achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly lower than CMOD.L's 22.33% return.

KO

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 1.43%
• YTD: 14.56%
• 6M: 14.00%
• 1Y: 14.71%
• 3Y*: 12.88%
• 5Y*: 10.72%
• 10Y*: 8.99%

CMOD.L

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -3.74%
• YTD: 22.33%
• 6M: 22.42%
• 1Y: 33.62%
• 3Y*: 14.20%
• 5Y*: 10.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KO vs. CMOD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KO The Coca-Cola Company	14.56%	15.60%	8.88%	-4.43%	10.61%	11.37%	2.47%	20.60%	6.77%	13.61%
CMOD.L Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF	22.33%	16.16%	4.12%	-7.56%	14.50%	27.35%	-3.87%	6.64%	-10.22%	2.08%

Correlation

The correlation between KO and CMOD.L is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2017	0.04

The correlation between KO and CMOD.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

KO vs. CMOD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KO

KO Risk / Return Rank: 69
KO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
KO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
KO Omega Ratio Rank: 61
KO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
KO Martin Ratio Rank: 71

CMOD.L

CMOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
CMOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
CMOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
CMOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 68
CMOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
CMOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KO vs. CMOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Coca-Cola Company (KO) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (CMOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KO	CMOD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	1.98	-1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	2.50	-1.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.37	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	4.60	-2.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.66	10.43	-6.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KO vs. CMOD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KO Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the CMOD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KO and CMOD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KO	CMOD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90	1.98	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.63	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.47	+0.06

Drawdowns

KO vs. CMOD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KO drawdown since its inception was -68.23%, which is greater than CMOD.L's maximum drawdown of -33.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KO and CMOD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	KO	CMOD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.23%	-33.16%	-35.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.89%	-7.28%	-0.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.26%	-11.65%	-4.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.27%	-26.86%	+9.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.91%	-7.23%	+4.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.09%	-12.25%	-3.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.03%	3.21%	+0.82%

Volatility

KO vs. CMOD.L - Volatility Comparison

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (CMOD.L) at 5.26%. This indicates that KO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMOD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KO	CMOD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.81%	5.26%	+0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.37%	15.05%	-2.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.37%	16.91%	-0.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.10%	16.60%	-0.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.21%	14.68%	+3.53%

Dividends

KO vs. CMOD.L - Dividend Comparison

KO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, while CMOD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMOD.L Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KO The Coca-Cola Company	2.59%	2.92%	3.12%	3.12%	2.77%	2.84%	2.99%	2.89%	3.29%	3.23%	3.38%	3.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KO and CMOD.L in my portfolio?

KO and CMOD.L have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.