PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KMX vs. AZO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KMX vs. AZO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CarMax, Inc. (KMX) and AutoZone, Inc. (AZO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMX achieves a 22.93% return, which is significantly higher than AZO's -9.36% return. Over the past 10 years, KMX has underperformed AZO with an annualized return of -0.36%, while AZO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.09% annualized return.


KMX

1D
0.74%
1M
17.75%
YTD
22.93%
6M
20.99%
1Y
-27.71%
3Y*
-15.53%
5Y*
-16.21%
10Y*
-0.36%

AZO

1D
-1.36%
1M
-12.07%
YTD
-9.36%
6M
-18.39%
1Y
-17.35%
3Y*
9.16%
5Y*
17.26%
10Y*
15.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMX vs. AZO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KMX
CarMax, Inc.
22.93%-52.74%6.54%26.03%-53.24%37.87%7.74%39.76%-2.18%-0.40%
AZO
AutoZone, Inc.
-9.36%5.92%23.84%4.84%17.64%76.84%-0.49%42.10%17.85%-9.93%

Correlation

The correlation between KMX and AZO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 1997

0.31

The correlation between KMX and AZO shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.32 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KMX:

$7.01B

AZO:

$51.80B

EPS

KMX:

$1.66

AZO:

$145.27

PE Ratio

KMX:

28.69

AZO:

21.16

PS Ratio

KMX:

0.27

AZO:

2.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

KMX:

$25.88B

AZO:

$19.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KMX:

$2.81B

AZO:

$10.34B

EBITDA (TTM)

KMX:

$768.58M

AZO:

$4.26B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KMX vs. AZO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMX
KMX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
KMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
KMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

AZO
AZO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
AZO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
AZO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMX vs. AZO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CarMax, Inc. (KMX) and AutoZone, Inc. (AZO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KMXAZODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.91

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

-0.53

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.77

-1.15

+0.38

KMX vs. AZO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMX Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is comparable to the AZO Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMX and AZO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KMXAZODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.53

-0.64

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.37

0.71

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

0.57

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.63

-0.52

Drawdowns

KMX vs. AZO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMX drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, which is greater than AZO's maximum drawdown of -46.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMX and AZO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KMXAZODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.19%

-46.32%

-46.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.85%

-32.59%

-24.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.38%

-32.59%

-32.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.06%

-32.59%

-47.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.06%

-42.14%

-37.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.33%

-29.41%

-39.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.74%

-10.88%

-20.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.04%

15.08%

+20.96%

Volatility

KMX vs. AZO - Volatility Comparison

CarMax, Inc. (KMX) has a higher volatility of 11.99% compared to AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) at 11.38%. This indicates that KMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AZO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KMXAZODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.99%

11.38%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.46%

22.93%

+11.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.71%

27.20%

+25.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.23%

24.45%

+19.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.53%

26.48%

+14.05%

Dividends

KMX vs. AZO - Dividend Comparison

Neither KMX nor AZO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

KMX vs. AZO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CarMax, Inc. and AutoZone, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B10.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
4.52B
4.84B
(KMX) Total Revenue
(AZO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KMX vs. AZO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CarMax, Inc. and AutoZone, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
9.3%
52.2%
Portfolio components
KMX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CarMax, Inc. reported a gross profit of 420.20M and revenue of 4.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.3%.

AZO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.52B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.

KMX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CarMax, Inc. reported an operating income of -339.44M and revenue of 4.52B, resulting in an operating margin of -7.5%.

AZO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported an operating income of 923.76M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.1%.

KMX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CarMax, Inc. reported a net income of -120.68M and revenue of 4.52B, resulting in a net margin of -2.7%.

AZO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported a net income of 641.49M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KMX and AZO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KMX has higher volatility (11.99%) compared to AZO (11.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMX dropped -93.19% vs AZO's -46.32%.

KMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.53 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KMX and AZO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer