KHC vs. FHKCX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

KHC (The Kraft Heinz Company) is a stock, while FHKCX (Fidelity China Region Fund) is China Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, KHC returned -8.03%/yr vs 14.35%/yr for FHKCX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KHC vs. FHKCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KHC achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly lower than FHKCX's 29.64% return. Over the past 10 years, KHC has underperformed FHKCX with an annualized return of -8.03%, while FHKCX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.35% annualized return.

KHC

• 1D: 3.41%
• 1M: -0.78%
• YTD: -0.32%
• 6M: -1.38%
• 1Y: -6.78%
• 3Y*: -9.33%
• 5Y*: -7.02%
• 10Y*: -8.03%

FHKCX

• 1D: -5.93%
• 1M: -3.92%
• YTD: 29.64%
• 6M: 30.43%
• 1Y: 68.65%
• 3Y*: 30.45%
• 5Y*: 7.32%
• 10Y*: 14.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KHC vs. FHKCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KHC The Kraft Heinz Company	-0.32%	-16.31%	-12.96%	-5.04%	18.18%	7.98%	13.78%	-21.20%	-42.25%	-8.37%
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund	29.64%	42.56%	23.15%	-0.29%	-23.87%	-13.69%	47.85%	35.12%	-17.43%	51.94%

Correlation

The correlation between KHC and FHKCX is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015	0.16

The correlation between KHC and FHKCX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

KHC vs. FHKCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KHC

KHC Risk / Return Rank: 30
KHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
KHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
KHC Omega Ratio Rank: 27
KHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
KHC Martin Ratio Rank: 32

FHKCX

FHKCX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FHKCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FHKCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FHKCX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FHKCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FHKCX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KHC vs. FHKCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KHC	FHKCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.27	3.13	-3.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.20	3.73	-3.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.54	-0.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.29	6.41	-6.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.53	19.68	-20.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KHC vs. FHKCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KHC Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the FHKCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KHC and FHKCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KHC	FHKCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.27	3.13	-3.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.31	0.30	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.30	0.64	-0.94
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.21	0.43	-0.64

Drawdowns

KHC vs. FHKCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KHC drawdown since its inception was -76.07%, which is greater than FHKCX's maximum drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KHC and FHKCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	KHC	FHKCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.07%	-61.96%	-14.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.19%	-10.80%	-12.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.72%	-22.02%	-16.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.69%	-52.42%	+10.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-76.07%	-58.41%	-17.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.29%	-7.33%	-54.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.43%	-20.26%	-22.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.81%	3.51%	+9.30%

Volatility

KHC vs. FHKCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC) is 7.77%, while Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) has a volatility of 9.34%. This indicates that KHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHKCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KHC	FHKCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.77%	9.34%	-1.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.61%	17.87%	+0.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.46%	22.12%	+3.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.42%	24.38%	-1.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.08%	22.40%	+4.68%

Dividends

KHC vs. FHKCX - Dividend Comparison

KHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.85%, more than FHKCX's 1.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund	1.35%	1.75%	1.39%	1.92%	1.05%	10.77%	4.85%	0.66%	0.83%	0.39%	1.35%	15.47%
KHC The Kraft Heinz Company	6.85%	6.60%	5.21%	4.33%	3.93%	4.46%	4.62%	4.98%	5.81%	3.15%	2.69%	25.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KHC and FHKCX in my portfolio?

KHC and FHKCX have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KHC or FHKCX?

FHKCX has higher volatility (9.34%) compared to KHC (7.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KHC dropped -76.07% vs FHKCX's -61.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHKCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.