KEN vs. SE
KEN (Kenon Holdings Ltd.) and SE (Sea Limited) are both stocks. KEN operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities), while SE operates in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, KEN returned 34.36%/yr vs -20.32%/yr for SE. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KEN vs. SE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEN achieves a 20.71% return, which is significantly higher than SE's -33.77% return.
KEN
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -13.88%
- YTD
- 20.71%
- 6M
- 30.64%
- 1Y
- 116.81%
- 3Y*
- 61.79%
- 5Y*
- 34.36%
- 10Y*
- 42.04%
SE
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- -2.58%
- YTD
- -33.77%
- 6M
- -34.14%
- 1Y
- -48.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.06%
- 5Y*
- -20.32%
- 10Y*
- —
KEN vs. SE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 20.71% | 126.18% | 62.44% | -19.16% | -23.73% | 93.65% | 57.17% | 50.73% | 23.06% | 28.49% |
SE Sea Limited | -33.77% | 20.24% | 161.98% | -22.16% | -76.74% | 12.39% | 394.90% | 255.30% | -15.08% | -18.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between KEN and SE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2017 | 0.19 |
The correlation between KEN and SE shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KEN:
$4.06B
SE:
$53.75B
KEN:
$1.54
SE:
$2.57
KEN:
49.63
SE:
32.82
KEN:
8.33
SE:
0.15
KEN:
4.01
SE:
2.10
KEN:
2.71
SE:
4.18
KEN:
$1.01B
SE:
$25.19B
KEN:
$166.82M
SE:
$11.15B
KEN:
$339.95M
SE:
$2.33B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KEN vs. SE — Risk / Return Rank
KEN
SE
KEN vs. SE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) and Sea Limited (SE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KEN | SE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 0.82 | +0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.49 | -0.82 | +6.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.50 | -1.37 | +20.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KEN | SE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.01 | -0.97 | +3.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | -0.32 | +1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.34 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
KEN vs. SE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEN drawdown since its inception was -69.20%, smaller than the maximum SE drawdown of -90.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEN and SE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEN | SE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.20% | -90.51% | +21.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.39% | -60.22% | +38.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.27% | -60.22% | +27.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.20% | -90.51% | +21.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.88% | -76.98% | +57.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.18% | -44.06% | +20.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.02% | 35.90% | -29.88% |
Volatility
KEN vs. SE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) is 14.44%, while Sea Limited (SE) has a volatility of 19.06%. This indicates that KEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KEN | SE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.44% | 19.06% | -4.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.95% | 37.96% | -8.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.14% | 50.73% | -11.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.77% | 64.12% | -24.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.90% | 62.63% | -20.73% |
Dividends
KEN vs. SE - Dividend Comparison
KEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, while SE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 5.03% | 7.24% | 11.18% | 11.46% | 25.00% | 7.35% | 7.41% | 5.75% | 96.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 45.52% |
SE Sea Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
KEN vs. SE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kenon Holdings Ltd. and Sea Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KEN vs. SE - Profitability Comparison
KEN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 47.00M and revenue of 317.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.8%.
SE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sea Limited reported a gross profit of 3.15B and revenue of 7.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.
KEN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
SE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sea Limited reported an operating income of 565.39M and revenue of 7.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.
KEN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 26.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.
SE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sea Limited reported a net income of 427.94M and revenue of 7.10B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KEN and SE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SE has higher volatility (19.06%) compared to KEN (14.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEN dropped -69.20% vs SE's -90.51%.
KEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KEN and SE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer