KEN vs. HYMC
KEN (Kenon Holdings Ltd.) and HYMC (Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation) are both stocks. KEN operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities), while HYMC operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, KEN returned 34.36%/yr vs -6.12%/yr for HYMC. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KEN vs. HYMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEN achieves a 20.71% return, which is significantly higher than HYMC's 10.77% return.
KEN
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -13.88%
- YTD
- 20.71%
- 6M
- 30.64%
- 1Y
- 116.81%
- 3Y*
- 61.79%
- 5Y*
- 34.36%
- 10Y*
- 42.04%
HYMC
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -31.50%
- YTD
- 10.77%
- 6M
- 133.42%
- 1Y
- 506.68%
- 3Y*
- 101.80%
- 5Y*
- -6.12%
- 10Y*
- —
KEN vs. HYMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 20.71% | 126.18% | 62.44% | -19.16% | -23.73% | 93.65% | 57.17% | 50.73% | -10.70% |
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation | 10.77% | 975.57% | -9.80% | -53.96% | -13.30% | -92.18% | -24.03% | 4.59% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between KEN and HYMC is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2018 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
KEN:
$4.06B
HYMC:
$2.36B
KEN:
$1.54
HYMC:
-$1.64
KEN:
2.71
HYMC:
10.56
KEN:
$1.01B
HYMC:
$0.00
KEN:
$166.82M
HYMC:
-$4.65M
KEN:
$339.95M
HYMC:
-$69.17M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KEN vs. HYMC — Risk / Return Rank
KEN
HYMC
KEN vs. HYMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KEN | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.46 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.49 | 9.69 | -4.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.50 | 22.66 | -3.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KEN | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.01 | 4.28 | -1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | -0.04 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | -0.12 | +0.87 |
Drawdowns
KEN vs. HYMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEN drawdown since its inception was -69.20%, smaller than the maximum HYMC drawdown of -98.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEN and HYMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEN | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.20% | -98.89% | +29.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.39% | -52.76% | +31.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.27% | -63.45% | +31.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.20% | -95.18% | +25.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.88% | -83.36% | +63.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.18% | -63.35% | +40.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.02% | 22.51% | -16.49% |
Volatility
KEN vs. HYMC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) is 14.44%, while Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a volatility of 26.05%. This indicates that KEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KEN | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.44% | 26.05% | -11.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.95% | 94.84% | -64.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.14% | 119.54% | -80.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.77% | 152.53% | -112.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.90% | 123.03% | -81.13% |
Dividends
KEN vs. HYMC - Dividend Comparison
KEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, while HYMC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 5.03% | 7.24% | 11.18% | 11.46% | 25.00% | 7.35% | 7.41% | 5.75% | 96.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 45.52% |
Financials
KEN vs. HYMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kenon Holdings Ltd. and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
KEN and HYMC have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYMC has higher volatility (26.05%) compared to KEN (14.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEN dropped -69.20% vs HYMC's -98.89%.
HYMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.28 vs 3.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KEN and HYMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer