KBR vs. ACM
KBR (KBR, Inc.) and ACM (AECOM) are both stocks. Both operate in the Engineering & Construction industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, KBR returned 10.66%/yr vs 8.49%/yr for ACM. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
KBR vs. ACM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBR achieves a -12.02% return, which is significantly higher than ACM's -25.17% return. Over the past 10 years, KBR has outperformed ACM with an annualized return of 10.66%, while ACM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.49% annualized return.
KBR
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 8.21%
- YTD
- -12.02%
- 6M
- -18.59%
- 1Y
- -33.30%
- 3Y*
- -16.90%
- 5Y*
- -1.20%
- 10Y*
- 10.66%
ACM
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -12.09%
- YTD
- -25.17%
- 6M
- -29.69%
- 1Y
- -35.66%
- 3Y*
- -4.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.79%
- 10Y*
- 8.49%
KBR vs. ACM - Yearly Performance Comparison
Correlation
The correlation between KBR and ACM is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007 | 0.58 |
The correlation between KBR and ACM shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.58 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KBR:
$4.47B
ACM:
$9.25B
KBR:
$3.11
ACM:
$3.82
KBR:
11.33
ACM:
18.53
KBR:
0.07
ACM:
0.11
KBR:
0.59
ACM:
0.59
KBR:
2.82
ACM:
4.08
KBR:
$7.69B
ACM:
$15.99B
KBR:
$1.12B
ACM:
$1.24B
KBR:
$883.00M
ACM:
$976.83M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBR vs. ACM — Risk / Return Rank
KBR
ACM
KBR vs. ACM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KBR, Inc. (KBR) and AECOM (ACM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KBR | ACM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.78 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | -0.75 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | -1.45 | -0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KBR | ACM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.06 | -1.12 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.11 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.27 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.19 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
KBR vs. ACM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBR drawdown since its inception was -77.47%, which is greater than ACM's maximum drawdown of -59.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBR and ACM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBR | ACM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.47% | -59.97% | -17.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.18% | -48.02% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.39% | -48.02% | -9.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.39% | -48.02% | -9.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.94% | -54.12% | -3.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.09% | -46.91% | -3.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.94% | -18.46% | -15.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.71% | 24.54% | -2.83% |
Volatility
KBR vs. ACM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KBR, Inc. (KBR) is 12.12%, while AECOM (ACM) has a volatility of 14.54%. This indicates that KBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBR | ACM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.12% | 14.54% | -2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.71% | 26.10% | -1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.66% | 31.96% | -0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.59% | 26.66% | +1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.83% | 31.17% | +5.66% |
Dividends
KBR vs. ACM - Dividend Comparison
KBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than ACM's 1.61% yield.
Financials
KBR vs. ACM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KBR, Inc. and AECOM. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KBR vs. ACM - Profitability Comparison
KBR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KBR, Inc. reported a gross profit of 265.00M and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.8%.
ACM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AECOM reported a gross profit of 296.50M and revenue of 3.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.8%.
KBR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KBR, Inc. reported an operating income of 180.00M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.
ACM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AECOM reported an operating income of 229.65M and revenue of 3.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.
KBR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KBR, Inc. reported a net income of 102.00M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
ACM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AECOM reported a net income of 179.86M and revenue of 3.80B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KBR and ACM have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACM has higher volatility (14.54%) compared to KBR (12.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBR dropped -77.47% vs ACM's -59.97%.
KBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.06 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KBR and ACM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer