PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBGGY vs. RR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KBGGY vs. RR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kongsberg Gruppen ASA (KBGGY) and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

KBGGY is traded in USD, while RR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBGGY achieves a 56.88% return, which is significantly higher than RR.L's 8.99% return.


KBGGY

1D
1.71%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
56.88%
6M
59.13%
1Y
-42.18%
3Y*
70.31%
5Y*
10Y*

RR.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
1.01%
YTD
8.99%
6M
14.37%
1Y
41.49%
3Y*
108.75%
5Y*
60.80%
10Y*
19.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBGGY vs. RR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
KBGGY
Kongsberg Gruppen ASA
56.88%19.00%164.60%-2.54%
RR.L
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC
8.99%120.24%86.56%96.51%

Correlation

The correlation between KBGGY and RR.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2023

0.20

The correlation between KBGGY and RR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBGGY vs. RR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBGGY
KBGGY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
KBGGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBGGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBGGY Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
KBGGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBGGY Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

RR.L
RR.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
RR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
RR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBGGY vs. RR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kongsberg Gruppen ASA (KBGGY) and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBGGYRR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.21

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

2.07

-2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.79

5.93

-6.72

KBGGY vs. RR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBGGY Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the RR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBGGY and RR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBGGYRR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.69

1.10

-1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.20

+0.90

Drawdowns

KBGGY vs. RR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBGGY drawdown since its inception was -68.35%, smaller than the maximum RR.L drawdown of -92.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBGGY and RR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBGGYRR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.35%

-92.32%

+23.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.35%

-19.98%

-48.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.35%

-23.51%

-44.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.78%

-7.50%

-36.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.13%

-36.66%

+16.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.62%

6.97%

+46.65%

Volatility

KBGGY vs. RR.L - Volatility Comparison

Kongsberg Gruppen ASA (KBGGY) has a higher volatility of 13.48% compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) at 12.27%. This indicates that KBGGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBGGYRR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.48%

12.27%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.07%

32.28%

+5.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.43%

37.67%

+23.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.61%

43.89%

+17.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.61%

50.20%

+11.41%

Dividends

KBGGY vs. RR.L - Dividend Comparison

KBGGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.23%, more than RR.L's 0.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBGGY
Kongsberg Gruppen ASA
24.23%5.82%1.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RR.L
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC
0.75%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.71%1.41%0.54%1.75%4.06%

Financials

KBGGY vs. RR.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kongsberg Gruppen ASA and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B10.00B11.00B12.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
11.72B
(KBGGY) Total Revenue
(RR.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. KBGGY values in USD, RR.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions


KBGGY and RR.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBGGY and RR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer