K vs. IWMY

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

K (Kellogg Company) is a stock, while IWMY (Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) is Options Trading fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

K vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kellogg Company (K) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

K

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IWMY

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -0.57%
• YTD: 10.55%
• 6M: 8.47%
• 1Y: 19.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

K vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
K Kellogg Company	0.00%	5.99%	49.75%	12.60%
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF	10.55%	10.18%	5.56%	10.06%

Correlation

The correlation between K and IWMY is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2023	0.09

Return for Risk

K vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMY

IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 37
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 35
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

K vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kellogg Company (K) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	K	IWMY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.90	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	K	IWMY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-18.72%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-2.89%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-2.98%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.53%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	K	IWMY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.26%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.20%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	16.15%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	15.90%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	15.90%	—

Dividends

K vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison

K has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.29%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF	46.29%	63.33%	107.92%	11.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
K Kellogg Company	1.39%	2.76%	2.79%	10.56%	3.28%	3.59%	3.66%	3.27%	3.86%	3.12%	2.77%	2.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both K and IWMY in my portfolio?

K and IWMY have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.