PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
K.TO vs. DFY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

K.TO vs. DFY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and Definity Financial Corp (DFY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, K.TO achieves a -6.51% return, which is significantly higher than DFY.TO's -7.17% return.


K.TO

1D
-1.23%
1M
-16.30%
YTD
-6.51%
6M
-1.43%
1Y
75.29%
3Y*
79.50%
5Y*
33.08%
10Y*
19.71%

DFY.TO

1D
2.57%
1M
2.45%
YTD
-7.17%
6M
-0.04%
1Y
-4.42%
3Y*
26.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

K.TO vs. DFY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corporation
-6.51%191.80%69.08%49.14%-22.75%-15.98%
DFY.TO
Definity Financial Corp
-7.17%31.30%57.75%-0.94%32.39%5.46%

Correlation

The correlation between K.TO and DFY.TO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2021

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

K.TO:

CA$43.41B

DFY.TO:

CA$8.56B

EPS

K.TO:

CA$2.36

DFY.TO:

CA$3.24

PE Ratio

K.TO:

15.26

DFY.TO:

21.68

PEG Ratio

K.TO:

0.20

DFY.TO:

1.33

PS Ratio

K.TO:

5.50

DFY.TO:

1.50

PB Ratio

K.TO:

4.77

DFY.TO:

2.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

K.TO:

CA$7.97B

DFY.TO:

CA$5.62B

Gross Profit (TTM)

K.TO:

CA$4.26B

DFY.TO:

CA$2.65B

EBITDA (TTM)

K.TO:

CA$5.03B

DFY.TO:

CA$733.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

K.TO vs. DFY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

K.TO
K.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
K.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
K.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
K.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
K.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
K.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

DFY.TO
DFY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
DFY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
DFY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

K.TO vs. DFY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) and Definity Financial Corp (DFY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


K.TODFY.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.99

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

-0.21

+2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.53

-0.38

+6.91

K.TO vs. DFY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current K.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the DFY.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of K.TO and DFY.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


K.TODFY.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

-0.20

+1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

1.06

-0.94

Drawdowns

K.TO vs. DFY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum K.TO drawdown since its inception was -92.37%, which is greater than DFY.TO's maximum drawdown of -20.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for K.TO and DFY.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


K.TODFY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.37%

-20.98%

-71.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.38%

-20.98%

-9.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.38%

-20.98%

-9.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.38%

-10.74%

-19.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.97%

-6.38%

-49.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.56%

11.76%

-0.20%

Volatility

K.TO vs. DFY.TO - Volatility Comparison

Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.35% compared to Definity Financial Corp (DFY.TO) at 8.76%. This indicates that K.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


K.TODFY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.35%

8.76%

+7.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.46%

17.93%

+20.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.39%

22.40%

+27.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.32%

23.51%

+18.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.55%

23.51%

+22.04%

Dividends

K.TO vs. DFY.TO - Dividend Comparison

K.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than DFY.TO's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DFY.TO
Definity Financial Corp
1.11%0.99%1.09%1.47%1.43%0.00%0.00%
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corporation
0.56%0.45%1.23%2.04%2.68%1.63%0.85%

Financials

K.TO vs. DFY.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinross Gold Corporation and Definity Financial Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
2.41B
1.92B
(K.TO) Total Revenue
(DFY.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

K.TO vs. DFY.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kinross Gold Corporation and Definity Financial Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
59.9%
100.0%
Portfolio components
K.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.44B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.9%.

DFY.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Definity Financial Corp reported a gross profit of 1.92B and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

K.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.33B and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.

DFY.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Definity Financial Corp reported an operating income of 92.20M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.

K.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 843.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.

DFY.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Definity Financial Corp reported a net income of 63.90M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


K.TO and DFY.TO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for K.TO and DFY.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer