JPM vs. LAES
JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.) and LAES (SEALSQ Corp) are both stocks. JPM operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while LAES operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 3 years, JPM returned 33.18%/yr vs -31.28%/yr for LAES. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JPM vs. LAES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPM achieves a -2.52% return, which is significantly higher than LAES's -14.81% return.
JPM
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- -2.52%
- 6M
- -0.35%
- 1Y
- 19.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.18%
- 5Y*
- 16.72%
- 10Y*
- 20.32%
LAES
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 10.27%
- YTD
- -14.81%
- 6M
- -34.42%
- 1Y
- -6.94%
- 3Y*
- -31.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPM vs. LAES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | -2.52% | 37.27% | 44.29% | 26.31% |
LAES SEALSQ Corp | -14.81% | -38.54% | 380.47% | -92.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPM and LAES is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2023 | 0.16 |
The correlation between JPM and LAES shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (3 years) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
JPM:
$21.08
LAES:
-$0.43
JPM:
3.05
LAES:
10.60
JPM:
$285.09B
LAES:
$35.37M
JPM:
$173.52B
LAES:
$13.21M
JPM:
$81.46B
LAES:
-$41.81M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPM vs. LAES — Risk / Return Rank
JPM
LAES
JPM vs. LAES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and SEALSQ Corp (LAES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPM | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.08 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | -0.10 | +1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.98 | -0.16 | +3.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPM | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | -0.06 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | -0.28 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
JPM vs. LAES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPM drawdown since its inception was -76.16%, smaller than the maximum LAES drawdown of -98.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPM and LAES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPM | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.16% | -98.44% | +22.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.47% | -72.68% | +57.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.42% | -98.07% | +73.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.55% | -85.34% | +78.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.62% | -84.70% | +67.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.50% | 42.96% | -36.46% |
Volatility
JPM vs. LAES - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is 6.40%, while SEALSQ Corp (LAES) has a volatility of 28.36%. This indicates that JPM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPM | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 28.36% | -21.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.38% | 66.00% | -48.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.62% | 110.53% | -88.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.45% | 170.27% | -145.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.40% | 170.27% | -142.87% |
Dividends
JPM vs. LAES - Dividend Comparison
JPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, while LAES has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 1.90% | 1.72% | 1.92% | 2.38% | 2.98% | 2.34% | 2.83% | 2.37% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.13% | 2.54% |
LAES SEALSQ Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
JPM vs. LAES - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and SEALSQ Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
JPM and LAES have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LAES has higher volatility (28.36%) compared to JPM (6.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPM dropped -76.16% vs LAES's -98.44%.
JPM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPM and LAES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer