JPM vs. CRWV
JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.) and CRWV (CoreWeave, Inc.) are both stocks. JPM operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while CRWV operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past year, JPM returned 19.35% vs -26.96% for CRWV. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JPM vs. CRWV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPM achieves a -2.52% return, which is significantly lower than CRWV's 42.95% return.
JPM
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- -2.52%
- 6M
- -0.35%
- 1Y
- 19.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.18%
- 5Y*
- 16.72%
- 10Y*
- 20.32%
CRWV
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- -10.32%
- YTD
- 42.95%
- 6M
- 18.70%
- 1Y
- -26.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPM vs. CRWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | -2.52% | 31.93% |
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. | 42.95% | 83.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPM and CRWV is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025 | 0.17 |
Fundamentals
JPM:
$869.15B
CRWV:
$53.95B
JPM:
$21.08
CRWV:
-$3.27
JPM:
3.05
CRWV:
8.00
JPM:
2.53
CRWV:
11.34
JPM:
$285.09B
CRWV:
$6.23B
JPM:
$173.52B
CRWV:
$4.32B
JPM:
$81.46B
CRWV:
$1.89B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPM vs. CRWV — Risk / Return Rank
JPM
CRWV
JPM vs. CRWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPM | CRWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.02 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | -0.42 | +1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.98 | -0.62 | +3.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPM | CRWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | -0.28 | +1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 1.06 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
JPM vs. CRWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPM drawdown since its inception was -76.16%, which is greater than CRWV's maximum drawdown of -64.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPM and CRWV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPM | CRWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.16% | -64.84% | -11.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.47% | -64.84% | +49.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.55% | -44.24% | +37.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.62% | -37.21% | +19.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.50% | 43.73% | -37.23% |
Volatility
JPM vs. CRWV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is 6.40%, while CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) has a volatility of 25.28%. This indicates that JPM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPM | CRWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 25.28% | -18.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.38% | 68.15% | -50.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.62% | 95.71% | -74.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.45% | 114.59% | -90.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.40% | 114.59% | -87.19% |
Dividends
JPM vs. CRWV - Dividend Comparison
JPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, while CRWV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 1.90% | 1.72% | 1.92% | 2.38% | 2.98% | 2.34% | 2.83% | 2.37% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.13% | 2.54% |
Financials
JPM vs. CRWV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and CoreWeave, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
JPM vs. CRWV - Profitability Comparison
JPM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a gross profit of 47.33B and revenue of 73.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.3%.
CRWV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.36B and revenue of 2.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.5%.
JPM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported an operating income of 20.48B and revenue of 73.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.8%.
CRWV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported an operating income of -144.00M and revenue of 2.08B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.9%.
JPM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a net income of 16.49B and revenue of 73.66B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.
CRWV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported a net income of -740.00M and revenue of 2.08B, resulting in a net margin of -35.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
JPM and CRWV have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRWV has higher volatility (25.28%) compared to JPM (6.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPM dropped -76.16% vs CRWV's -64.84%.
JPM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPM and CRWV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer