PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPM vs. BTQ.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

JPM vs. BTQ.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and BTQ Technologies Corp (BTQ.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JPM is traded in USD, while BTQ.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the BTQ.NEO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPM achieves a -2.52% return, which is significantly higher than BTQ.NEO's -17.44% return.


JPM

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.98%
YTD
-2.52%
6M
-0.35%
1Y
19.35%
3Y*
33.18%
5Y*
16.72%
10Y*
20.32%

BTQ.NEO

1D
3.73%
1M
39.02%
YTD
-17.44%
6M
-35.31%
1Y
37.44%
3Y*
106.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPM vs. BTQ.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
-2.52%37.27%44.29%22.25%
BTQ.NEO
BTQ Technologies Corp
-17.44%88.56%342.98%11.18%

Correlation

The correlation between JPM and BTQ.NEO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2023

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

JPM:

$869.15B

BTQ.NEO:

CA$821.41M

EPS

JPM:

$21.08

BTQ.NEO:

-CA$0.11

PS Ratio

JPM:

3.05

BTQ.NEO:

1.42K

PB Ratio

JPM:

2.53

BTQ.NEO:

21.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

JPM:

$285.09B

BTQ.NEO:

CA$565.50K

Gross Profit (TTM)

JPM:

$173.52B

BTQ.NEO:

CA$565.50K

EBITDA (TTM)

JPM:

$81.46B

BTQ.NEO:

-CA$14.23M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPM vs. BTQ.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPM
JPM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
JPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

BTQ.NEO
BTQ.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BTQ.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTQ.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTQ.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BTQ.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTQ.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPM vs. BTQ.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and BTQ Technologies Corp (BTQ.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPMBTQ.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.18

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

0.45

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.98

0.64

+2.35

JPM vs. BTQ.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPM Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the BTQ.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPM and BTQ.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPMBTQ.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

0.24

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.51

-0.17

Drawdowns

JPM vs. BTQ.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPM drawdown since its inception was -76.16%, smaller than the maximum BTQ.NEO drawdown of -84.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPM and BTQ.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPMBTQ.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.16%

-84.79%

+8.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.47%

-84.79%

+69.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.42%

-84.79%

+60.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.55%

-69.88%

+63.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.62%

-47.31%

+29.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.50%

59.10%

-52.60%

Volatility

JPM vs. BTQ.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is 6.40%, while BTQ Technologies Corp (BTQ.NEO) has a volatility of 42.02%. This indicates that JPM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTQ.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPMBTQ.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.40%

42.02%

-35.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.38%

84.92%

-67.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.62%

161.69%

-140.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.45%

172.11%

-147.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.40%

172.11%

-144.71%

Dividends

JPM vs. BTQ.NEO - Dividend Comparison

JPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, while BTQ.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTQ.NEO
BTQ Technologies Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.90%1.72%1.92%2.38%2.98%2.34%2.83%2.37%2.54%1.91%2.13%2.54%

Financials

JPM vs. BTQ.NEO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and BTQ Technologies Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
73.66B
0
(JPM) Total Revenue
(BTQ.NEO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. JPM values in USD, BTQ.NEO values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


JPM and BTQ.NEO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPM and BTQ.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer