JPM vs. AFL
JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.) and AFL (Aflac Incorporated) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — JPM in Banks - Diversified, AFL in Insurance - Life. Over the past 10 years, JPM returned 20.32%/yr vs 15.48%/yr for AFL. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JPM vs. AFL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPM achieves a -2.52% return, which is significantly lower than AFL's 5.61% return. Over the past 10 years, JPM has outperformed AFL with an annualized return of 20.32%, while AFL has yielded a comparatively lower 15.48% annualized return.
JPM
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- -2.52%
- 6M
- -0.35%
- 1Y
- 19.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.18%
- 5Y*
- 16.72%
- 10Y*
- 20.32%
AFL
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- YTD
- 5.61%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 13.52%
- 3Y*
- 21.24%
- 5Y*
- 17.94%
- 10Y*
- 15.48%
JPM vs. AFL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | -2.52% | 37.27% | 44.29% | 30.63% | -12.64% | 27.75% | -5.53% | 47.26% | -6.62% | 26.76% |
AFL Aflac Incorporated | 5.61% | 8.94% | 28.08% | 17.36% | 26.41% | 34.55% | -13.60% | 18.55% | 6.20% | 29.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPM and AFL is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984 | 0.42 |
The correlation between JPM and AFL shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.60 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
JPM:
$869.15B
AFL:
$59.32B
JPM:
$21.08
AFL:
$8.76
JPM:
14.76
AFL:
13.16
JPM:
1.63
AFL:
3.41
JPM:
3.05
AFL:
3.35
JPM:
2.53
AFL:
2.64
JPM:
$285.09B
AFL:
$18.22B
JPM:
$173.52B
AFL:
$8.70B
JPM:
$81.46B
AFL:
$6.67B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPM vs. AFL — Risk / Return Rank
JPM
AFL
JPM vs. AFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPM | AFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.14 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 1.49 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.98 | 3.70 | -0.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPM | AFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 0.80 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.86 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.60 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.48 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
JPM vs. AFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPM drawdown since its inception was -76.16%, smaller than the maximum AFL drawdown of -82.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPM and AFL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPM | AFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.16% | -82.71% | +6.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.47% | -9.11% | -6.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.42% | -13.56% | -10.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.77% | -19.86% | -18.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.63% | -54.89% | +11.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.55% | -2.54% | -4.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.62% | -11.66% | -5.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.50% | 3.67% | +2.83% |
Volatility
JPM vs. AFL - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to Aflac Incorporated (AFL) at 5.82%. This indicates that JPM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPM | AFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 5.82% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.38% | 12.24% | +5.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.62% | 17.08% | +4.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.45% | 20.94% | +3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.40% | 25.77% | +1.63% |
Dividends
JPM vs. AFL - Dividend Comparison
JPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than AFL's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFL Aflac Incorporated | 2.07% | 2.10% | 1.93% | 2.04% | 2.22% | 2.26% | 2.52% | 2.04% | 2.28% | 1.98% | 2.39% | 2.64% |
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 1.90% | 1.72% | 1.92% | 2.38% | 2.98% | 2.34% | 2.83% | 2.37% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.13% | 2.54% |
Financials
JPM vs. AFL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Aflac Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
JPM vs. AFL - Profitability Comparison
JPM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a gross profit of 47.33B and revenue of 73.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.3%.
AFL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported a gross profit of 2.48B and revenue of 4.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.5%.
JPM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported an operating income of 20.48B and revenue of 73.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.8%.
AFL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported an operating income of 1.23B and revenue of 4.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.
JPM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a net income of 16.49B and revenue of 73.66B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.
AFL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 4.32B, resulting in a net margin of 23.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
JPM and AFL have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JPM has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to AFL (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPM dropped -76.16% vs AFL's -82.71%.
JPM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPM and AFL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer