JNK vs. XYLD
JNK (SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JNK is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index, while XYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JNK returned 4.94%/yr vs 8.23%/yr for XYLD. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JNK charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.
Performance
JNK vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNK achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's 4.47% return. Over the past 10 years, JNK has underperformed XYLD with an annualized return of 4.94%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.23% annualized return.
JNK
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 6.98%
- 3Y*
- 8.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.59%
- 10Y*
- 4.94%
XYLD
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 4.47%
- 6M
- 5.83%
- 1Y
- 16.60%
- 3Y*
- 10.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- 8.23%
JNK vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNK SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF | 1.30% | 8.76% | 7.71% | 12.42% | -12.19% | 4.00% | 4.95% | 14.88% | -3.28% | 6.49% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 4.47% | 8.02% | 19.49% | 11.10% | -12.05% | 19.59% | -0.56% | 21.41% | -6.09% | 16.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between JNK and XYLD is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2013 | 0.59 |
The correlation between JNK and XYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (3 years) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JNK vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JNK
XYLD
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
JNK
XYLD
Energy
JNK
XYLD
Basic Materials
JNK
-
XYLD
Communication Services
JNK
-
XYLD
Consumer Cyclical
JNK
-
XYLD
Consumer Defensive
JNK
-
XYLD
Financial Services
JNK
-
XYLD
Healthcare
JNK
-
XYLD
Industrials
JNK
-
XYLD
Real Estate
JNK
-
XYLD
Utilities
JNK
-
XYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JNK vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank
JNK
XYLD
JNK vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JNK | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.59 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 3.15 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.30 | 16.73 | -4.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JNK | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.53 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.68 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.58 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.60 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
JNK vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNK drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNK and XYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNK | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.48% | -33.46% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.51% | -5.29% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.02% | -15.53% | +10.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.67% | -18.66% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.89% | -33.46% | +10.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -0.64% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -3.72% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 0.99% | -0.42% |
Volatility
JNK vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) is 1.12%, while Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) has a volatility of 1.33%. This indicates that JNK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JNK | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.12% | 1.33% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.00% | 5.46% | -2.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.84% | 6.60% | -2.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.55% | 11.23% | -3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.31% | 14.21% | -5.90% |
JNK vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNK has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
JNK vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison
JNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, less than XYLD's 10.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNK SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF | 6.64% | 6.54% | 6.63% | 6.38% | 6.06% | 4.27% | 5.11% | 5.44% | 5.90% | 5.60% | 6.06% | 6.59% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.57% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JNK and XYLD have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XYLD has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to JNK (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNK dropped -38.48% vs XYLD's -33.46%.
On 10-year performance, XYLD leads with 8.23% vs 4.94% for JNK. On fees, JNK is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, JNK has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XYLD has performed better with a 8.23% return vs 4.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JNK is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.57%, compared with 6.64% for JNK.
JNK is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while XYLD is Derivative Income. JNK tracks Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for JNK and 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JNK and XYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer