JNK vs. VFH
JNK (SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF) and VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JNK is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index, while VFH is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JNK returned 4.94%/yr vs 12.59%/yr for VFH. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JNK charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VFH.
Performance
JNK vs. VFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNK achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly higher than VFH's -4.26% return. Over the past 10 years, JNK has underperformed VFH with an annualized return of 4.94%, while VFH has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.
JNK
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 6.98%
- 3Y*
- 8.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.59%
- 10Y*
- 4.94%
VFH
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- -4.26%
- 6M
- -1.64%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.65%
- 10Y*
- 12.59%
JNK vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNK SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF | 1.30% | 8.76% | 7.71% | 12.42% | -12.19% | 4.00% | 4.95% | 14.88% | -3.28% | 6.49% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | -4.26% | 14.91% | 30.44% | 14.17% | -12.31% | 35.22% | -1.96% | 31.57% | -13.52% | 19.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between JNK and VFH is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2007 | 0.55 |
The correlation between JNK and VFH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
JNK vs. VFH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JNK
VFH
Technology
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
JNK
VFH
Energy
JNK
VFH
-
Basic Materials
JNK
-
VFH
-
Communication Services
JNK
-
VFH
Consumer Cyclical
JNK
-
VFH
Consumer Defensive
JNK
-
VFH
-
Financial Services
JNK
-
VFH
Healthcare
JNK
-
VFH
Industrials
JNK
-
VFH
Real Estate
JNK
-
VFH
Utilities
JNK
-
VFH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JNK vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank
JNK
VFH
JNK vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JNK | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.06 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 0.28 | +2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.30 | 0.74 | +11.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JNK | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 0.28 | +1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.45 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.56 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.24 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
JNK vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNK drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNK and VFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNK | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.48% | -78.61% | +40.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.51% | -14.75% | +12.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.02% | -17.30% | +12.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.67% | -25.66% | +8.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.89% | -44.42% | +21.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -7.17% | +6.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -18.53% | +14.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 5.60% | -5.03% |
Volatility
JNK vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) is 1.12%, while Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that JNK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JNK | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.12% | 4.28% | -3.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.00% | 11.34% | -8.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.84% | 14.98% | -11.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.55% | 19.34% | -11.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.31% | 22.56% | -14.25% |
JNK vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNK has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VFH's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
JNK vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison
JNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, more than VFH's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNK SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF | 6.64% | 6.54% | 6.63% | 6.38% | 6.06% | 4.27% | 5.11% | 5.44% | 5.90% | 5.60% | 6.06% | 6.59% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.53% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JNK and VFH have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFH has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to JNK (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNK dropped -38.48% vs VFH's -78.61%.
On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 12.59% vs 4.94% for JNK. On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, JNK has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 12.59% return vs 4.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JNK.
JNK has the higher dividend yield at 6.64%, compared with 1.53% for VFH.
JNK is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while VFH is Financials Equities. JNK tracks Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index, while VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for JNK and 0.09% for VFH.
JNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JNK and VFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer