PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNK vs. SCHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNK vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNK achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, JNK has outperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 4.94%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.53% annualized return.


JNK

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
1.30%
6M
1.95%
1Y
6.98%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
3.59%
10Y*
4.94%

SCHP

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
0.96%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
1.02%
10Y*
2.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNK vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNK
SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF
1.30%8.76%7.71%12.42%-12.19%4.00%4.95%14.88%-3.28%6.49%
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
0.96%6.76%1.95%3.91%-12.02%5.87%10.86%8.52%-1.78%3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between JNK and SCHP is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010

0.11

Over the past year, JNK and SCHP have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.

JNK vs. SCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JNK
SCHP

Technology

0.0%

-

Energy

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

100.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

JNK
0.0%
SCHP

-

Energy

JNK
0.0%
SCHP

-

Basic Materials

JNK

-

SCHP

-

Communication Services

JNK

-

SCHP

-

Consumer Cyclical

JNK

-

SCHP
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

JNK

-

SCHP

-

Financial Services

JNK

-

SCHP
0.0%

Healthcare

JNK

-

SCHP

-

Industrials

JNK

-

SCHP

-

Real Estate

JNK

-

SCHP

-

Utilities

JNK

-

SCHP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNK vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNK
JNK Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
JNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNK Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
JNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNK Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHP
SCHP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNK vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNKSCHPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.26

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

2.50

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.30

7.59

+4.72

JNK vs. SCHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNK Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the SCHP Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNK and SCHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNKSCHPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

1.47

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.17

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.45

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.50

-0.08

Drawdowns

JNK vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNK drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNK and SCHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNKSCHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.48%

-14.26%

-24.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

-1.93%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.02%

-4.48%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.67%

-14.26%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.89%

-14.26%

-8.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.89%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-3.93%

+0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

0.63%

-0.06%

Volatility

JNK vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) has a higher volatility of 1.12% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.00%. This indicates that JNK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNKSCHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

1.00%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.00%

2.24%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.84%

3.29%

+0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.55%

6.12%

+1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.31%

5.59%

+2.72%

JNK vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNK has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNK vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison

JNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, more than SCHP's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNK
SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF
6.64%6.54%6.63%6.38%6.06%4.27%5.11%5.44%5.90%5.60%6.06%6.59%
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
4.01%4.06%2.99%3.02%7.19%4.39%1.11%2.02%2.26%1.90%1.38%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNK and SCHP have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNK has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to SCHP (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNK dropped -38.48% vs SCHP's -14.26%.

On 10-year performance, JNK leads with 4.94% vs 2.53% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JNK has performed better with a 4.94% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JNK.

JNK has the higher dividend yield at 6.64%, compared with 4.01% for SCHP.

JNK is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. JNK tracks Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for JNK and 0.03% for SCHP.

JNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNK and SCHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer