JNK vs. IWO
JNK (SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF) and IWO (iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JNK is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index, while IWO is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JNK returned 4.94%/yr vs 11.06%/yr for IWO. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JNK charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for IWO.
Performance
JNK vs. IWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNK achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly lower than IWO's 14.48% return. Over the past 10 years, JNK has underperformed IWO with an annualized return of 4.94%, while IWO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.06% annualized return.
JNK
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 6.98%
- 3Y*
- 8.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.59%
- 10Y*
- 4.94%
IWO
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 14.48%
- 6M
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- 32.40%
- 3Y*
- 16.54%
- 5Y*
- 4.69%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
JNK vs. IWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNK SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF | 1.30% | 8.76% | 7.71% | 12.42% | -12.19% | 4.00% | 4.95% | 14.88% | -3.28% | 6.49% |
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 14.48% | 12.90% | 15.04% | 18.51% | -26.27% | 2.54% | 34.68% | 28.48% | -9.43% | 22.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between JNK and IWO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2007 | 0.60 |
The correlation between JNK and IWO shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JNK vs. IWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JNK
IWO
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
JNK
IWO
Energy
JNK
IWO
Basic Materials
JNK
-
IWO
Communication Services
JNK
-
IWO
Consumer Cyclical
JNK
-
IWO
Consumer Defensive
JNK
-
IWO
Financial Services
JNK
-
IWO
Healthcare
JNK
-
IWO
Industrials
JNK
-
IWO
Real Estate
JNK
-
IWO
Utilities
JNK
-
IWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JNK vs. IWO — Risk / Return Rank
JNK
IWO
JNK vs. IWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JNK | IWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.25 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 2.19 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.30 | 7.82 | +4.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JNK | IWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 1.50 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.19 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.46 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.28 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
JNK vs. IWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNK drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, smaller than the maximum IWO drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNK and IWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNK | IWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.48% | -60.11% | +21.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.51% | -14.87% | +12.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.02% | -28.57% | +23.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.67% | -40.51% | +23.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.89% | -42.02% | +19.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -3.45% | +2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -16.70% | +13.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 4.15% | -3.58% |
Volatility
JNK vs. IWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) is 1.12%, while iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) has a volatility of 7.62%. This indicates that JNK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JNK | IWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.12% | 7.62% | -6.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.00% | 16.25% | -13.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.84% | 21.81% | -17.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.55% | 24.56% | -17.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.31% | 24.17% | -15.86% |
JNK vs. IWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNK has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IWO's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
JNK vs. IWO - Dividend Comparison
JNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, more than IWO's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 0.41% | 0.56% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.71% | 0.76% | 0.73% | 0.97% | 0.89% |
JNK SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF | 6.64% | 6.54% | 6.63% | 6.38% | 6.06% | 4.27% | 5.11% | 5.44% | 5.90% | 5.60% | 6.06% | 6.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JNK and IWO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWO has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to JNK (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNK dropped -38.48% vs IWO's -60.11%.
On 10-year performance, IWO leads with 11.06% vs 4.94% for JNK. On fees, IWO is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, JNK has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWO has performed better with a 11.06% return vs 4.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWO is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JNK.
JNK has the higher dividend yield at 6.64%, compared with 0.41% for IWO.
JNK is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while IWO is Small Cap Growth Equities. JNK tracks Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index, while IWO tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for JNK and 0.24% for IWO.
JNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JNK and IWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer