PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNJ vs. HDEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNJ vs. HDEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNJ achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly higher than HDEF's 4.25% return. Over the past 10 years, JNJ has outperformed HDEF with an annualized return of 10.06%, while HDEF has yielded a comparatively lower 8.53% annualized return.


JNJ

1D
-0.26%
1M
5.50%
YTD
13.43%
6M
16.43%
1Y
53.49%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
10.06%

HDEF

1D
-0.03%
1M
-1.77%
YTD
4.25%
6M
7.32%
1Y
15.39%
3Y*
16.24%
5Y*
9.80%
10Y*
8.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNJ vs. HDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
13.43%47.48%-4.81%-8.58%5.97%11.44%10.82%16.22%-5.13%24.43%
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
4.25%33.01%2.85%18.53%-2.51%6.95%-1.90%25.02%-13.74%9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between JNJ and HDEF is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2015

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNJ vs. HDEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNJ
JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

HDEF
HDEF Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
HDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
HDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNJ vs. HDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNJHDEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.24

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.91

1.93

+2.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.52

5.82

+8.70

JNJ vs. HDEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNJ Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is higher than the HDEF Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNJ and HDEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNJHDEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19

1.32

+1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.70

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.53

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.45

+0.09

Drawdowns

JNJ vs. HDEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNJ drawdown since its inception was -50.67%, which is greater than HDEF's maximum drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNJ and HDEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNJHDEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.67%

-36.43%

-14.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.96%

-8.03%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.95%

-11.15%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.41%

-23.63%

+5.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.37%

-36.43%

+9.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.06%

-5.45%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.88%

-5.04%

-6.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

2.65%

+1.05%

Volatility

JNJ vs. HDEF - Volatility Comparison

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) at 3.05%. This indicates that JNJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNJHDEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

3.05%

+2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.41%

9.24%

+3.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.87%

11.71%

+5.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.87%

14.14%

+2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.47%

16.24%

+2.23%

Dividends

JNJ vs. HDEF - Dividend Comparison

JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than HDEF's 3.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
3.64%3.88%4.53%4.38%5.41%4.76%3.93%4.20%3.55%3.38%9.53%1.87%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
2.26%2.48%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNJ and HDEF have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNJ has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to HDEF (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNJ dropped -50.67% vs HDEF's -36.43%.

JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNJ and HDEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer