JNJ vs. GSIB

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) is a stock, while GSIB (Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF) is Financials Equities fund actively managed by Themes. Over the past year, JNJ returned 53.49% vs 41.62% for GSIB. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

JNJ vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNJ achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly higher than GSIB's 10.39% return.

JNJ

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 5.50%
• YTD: 13.43%
• 6M: 16.43%
• 1Y: 53.49%
• 3Y*: 16.56%
• 5Y*: 10.04%
• 10Y*: 10.06%

GSIB

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 4.05%
• YTD: 10.39%
• 6M: 15.52%
• 1Y: 41.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNJ vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JNJ Johnson & Johnson	13.43%	47.48%	-4.81%	-0.08%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	10.39%	61.67%	32.86%	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between JNJ and GSIB is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023	0.14

Return for Risk

JNJ vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNJ

JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 95
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 95
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 93

GSIB

GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 74
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 76
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNJ vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JNJ	GSIB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.19	2.41	+0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.65	3.35	+1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.40	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.91	3.01	+1.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.52	10.59	+3.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JNJ vs. GSIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNJ Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is higher than the GSIB Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNJ and GSIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JNJ	GSIB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.19	2.41	+0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	2.36	-1.82

Drawdowns

JNJ vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNJ drawdown since its inception was -50.67%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNJ and GSIB.

Drawdown Indicators

	JNJ	GSIB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.67%	-17.71%	-32.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.96%	-13.90%	+2.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.06%	-1.13%	-4.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.88%	-2.06%	-9.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.70%	3.94%	-0.24%

Volatility

JNJ vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) at 4.58%. This indicates that JNJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JNJ	GSIB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.80%	4.58%	+1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.41%	14.13%	-1.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.87%	17.39%	-0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.87%	18.46%	-1.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.47%	18.46%	+0.01%

Dividends

JNJ vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison

JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than GSIB's 1.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	1.73%	1.91%	1.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JNJ Johnson & Johnson	2.26%	2.48%	3.40%	3.00%	2.52%	2.45%	2.53%	2.57%	2.74%	2.38%	2.73%	2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JNJ and GSIB in my portfolio?

JNJ and GSIB have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JNJ or GSIB?

JNJ has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to GSIB (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNJ dropped -50.67% vs GSIB's -17.71%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.